Calvin Leong wrote: » Anyone seen Jovetic play? Any decent? Could be a decent shout...I remember people saying he had huge potential before his move to City
Tigerandahalf wrote: » Suarez is a huge loss. When you look at the team now you see how bare and lacking in top quality it is.
Oranage2 wrote: » 75 million is a bargain for Barca imo, Suarez will be a massive loss for Liverpool, it'll be an interesting window when players not nearly as good as him like Sanchez have turned down pool already.
Utopia Parkway wrote: » Hardly a bargain. 4th highest transfer ever for a soon to be 28 year old with a horrendous disciplinary record. Don't get me wrong he's a fantastic footballer but £75M is a lot of money. I would prefer the player but 75M is only a bargain if he shoots Barca to a few league titles and Champions Leagues.
Knex. wrote: » I just remembered this, and it made me laugh. Might make a few sad pandas here chuckle! Years back when I was in secondary school, around the time Saha had dreadlocks and was playing for United, a lad in my school decided he was going to be one of those white guys who attempted to pull of such dreadlocks. Walks into the first class of the day in front of a farmer/GAA Kerryhead, who turns around and in an awkward bogger tone says, "Christ, lad. Louis Saha, is it? More like Louis Haha" It was so bloody awkward, and the 'locks were gone within a few days. :pac:
Lostman1990 wrote: » 95 million euro....I'd take it and run. For a player who has never shown an ounce of loyalty to the club. I'm just shocked that more Liverpool fans are not angry with him. Last year, he publicly demeaned Liverpool. Talked about needing Champions League football and challenging for honours. He had that at Liverpool now. He gave a half-assed apology to fans and "signed" a bumper new contract saying how happy he was. But still the lack of loyalty was there. Another release clause...There is no doubt that he was a world class player. But some comments saying he is irreplaceable are nonsense. These type of players are always replaceable. Constantly destabilizing the club...It is always better to have these types of players gone. You very rarely heard this type of nonsense at Old Trafford under Ferguson. And they were a team of world class players.
NukaCola wrote: » Lads.......apparently Suarez will be a big loss to us next season........I'm glad it has been pointed out several hundred times because I had no idea.
Turtyturd wrote: » Unfortunately you read this type of nonsense too frequently on boards. Of course you would take 95 million and run, I'd do the same but we're not football clubs. Very few footballers show loyalty to any clubs, and few clubs show loyalty to players. Don't think he demeaned the club last year. Biggest disappointment was the lack of ambition he showed if he really was considering going to Arsenal, although I think he knew a big club would make a move. Fairly sure he signed the contract, not 'signed' it. He is replaceable alright, maybe we should have asked Barca to swap the best player in the world for him. You very rarely heard of this stuff under Fergie? It's an exact replay of the 'Ronnie' situation. I don't think any club has ever had a team of world class players.
klose wrote: » He will indeed, i think we should be targeting marco reus as his replacement....
the untitled user wrote: » Now that Suarez is gone, how do Liverpool fans see their first team shaping up for next season? Will Can and Lallana go straight into the side? Would someone like Bony be sufficient to maintain the last season's attacking threat or will Rodgers go in for someone more established?
Morzadec wrote: » I think I might do a little bit of a U-turn on Bony... I said before that I thought he was a good player, but that we would need someone better/more proven if we wanted to challenge. With Sanchez at Arsenal, I think we could do a lot worse than Bony, and I'm struggling of thinking of many better players we could attract. I do think he would improve our current squad quite significantly. The guy has a very good scoring rate wherever he goes, and has a lot more to his game than just goals. I think he is more complete than Remy for example. When he's on fire he does sometimes look like he can be 'unplayable'. There was talk that we could get him for £19m. That seems like a good price considering his age and what he showed in the Premier League last season. If he could score between 15-20 league goals (and I think he definitely is capable of this), then it would be a good contribution and a good piece of business. I think he would be a good effective signing and him and Sturridge could share the burden of the goals together. If we're talking about spending £25m-plus then I'm not sure if that's value, but for around £20m I think it could be a good piece of business and a player I'd like to see in a red shirt
Fescue wrote: » I disagree with a number of points raised in this post, though naturally I would give my own life and that of my cat for your right to express them. I want to qualify this by saying he is the most talented player I have ever seen at the club. No one can ever question his commitment, determination and contribution this season in particular. That shouldn't mean he gets a free pass to behave how he wants. First of all he has demeaned the club on at least four seperate occasions. The rascist incident with Evra, the refusal to shake his hand, biting Ivanovic and his behaviour last summer in trying to engineer a move from the club. That's not including his behaviour this summer. There is absolutely no comparison to Ronaldo's behaviour at Utd and that of Suarez. At no point was Ronaldo forced to train away from his teamates. The contract he signed effectively guaranteed his exit from the club and his performances this season may well have been about ensuring a move happened rather than any commitment to Liverpool. So while we can't question what he gave to Liverpool on the pitch, lets not sweep under the carpet the utter shame he brought at times to the club.
Shady Tady wrote: » Why is the likes of me allowed post on this forum?
Irishmale0399 wrote: » Why would Marco Reus want to move to Liverpool when he is playing every second week infront of 80,000 fans that idealise him and he is playing for his hometown club. Added to that BVB have just raised €320million through a share issue/sponsorship deal with Evonik Industries and they dont need to sell, the plan to pay off the stadium, buy their head office and invest the rest when and where needed. Same as Utd fans suggesting that Hummels is going to them.....both named players have already stated that they are happy where they are at the moment and for the foreseealble future.
not yet wrote: » I'm a Liverpool fan 41 years, In that time I have seen some Legends come and go, Players nobody thought could or would be replaced, They all where and will be again. THIS IS LIVERPOOL FC: YNWA.