Cjs21 wrote: » Actually, a question I've never seen asked. How much do ye all think Sturridge is worth?
Turtyturd wrote: » Saptimus Prime hit the nail on the head yesterday....thread has crossed the line into Naked Gun/Airplane territory
whatawaster wrote: » I'd take him, but not at £40m. I don't think he's better than Sturridge.
joe123 wrote: » Wilfred Bony. Good god almighty. Not worth near 19 million and is one of the slowest players in the league to boot. Lambert can do what Bony does. I just don't understand whats going on with our transfer dealings. Overpaying for average players is our game it seems. I would love Martinez. Even Remy at this stage.
gafferino wrote: » Yeah but is he better than Giroud?
rarnes1 wrote: » Yeah but was there a clause last summer?
Cjs21 wrote: » Yay or Nay?Liverpool ‘want £40million Karim Benzema as Luis Suarez replacement’
rarnes1 wrote: » Actually, Henry did come out and admit there was a clause but just refused to sell iirc. I'm not sure of the legal side of such clauses tbh.
googled eyes wrote: » It's still early. The rest will be amused soon
Mickeroo wrote: » No idea, reports at the time seemed to suggest that there was and also what Henry said a couple of months ago. The other possibility is it was BS from Suarez's agent at the time and Henry was just trying to make himself look good. Either scenario could be true sure. I don't think Arsenal would have bid for him if they didn't at least think there was a clause.
Liverpool in advanced talks with Swansea over Wilfried Bony with player's agent thought to be meeting Liverpool officials. #LFC #swansfc
Tusky wrote: » Allen has contributed almost nothing so far. He may go on to be a good signing but as it stands, that £15m could have been spent much better.
rob316 wrote: » :rolleyes: Would some people just accept he is gone, it is beyond speculation its only a matter of time now before it becomes reality with Sanchez sold.
rarnes1 wrote: » If there's a clause though, can you ignore it if a club meets it?