nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

Child Item

Toaiseach intervenes in Brooks debacle.

Happyman42

Interested in views on this, has Enda set a massive precedent here?

I think it is a fairly sinister development.

Find more posts tagged with

Quick Links

Comments

raymon

I would guess and hope now that Enda and co will give this whole complicated mess a wide berth and disappear.

Politicians should not interfere in planning (or justice). Interfering in these matters should be left to the new crop of Fianna Fail.

John_C

Cantremember wrote: »

A dig out perhaps. Or he could hide in the cupboard.

He had a way of getting things through the planning process which a lot of people seem nostalgic for.

bonkey

Godge wrote: »

Croke Park has been the national stadium of the GAA for nearly 100 years. Bar a few dozen residents still living in inherited family homes (who could have sold out if they wanted to) the rest of them knew what they were buying into. It is de facto the national stadium and always has been.

With you so far as long as we don't confuse "stadium" and "multi-purpose stadium".

It should be somewhere where there are 15-20 concerts per year as befits a national stadium.

But there never have been, and even if I agree with that view, it's most certainly not what the local residents knew they were buying into. In the past 20 years, there has been between 0 and 4 concerts (4 occurring once) a year. 15-20 ...or even 8...is well beyond what anyone could have been expected to know.

The GAA don't use it enough for the amount of taxpayer's money that went into it. Those are the considerations that Owen Keegan should have brought to his decision but didn't.

If there were to be provisos attached to the giving of tax-payers money, the time to do it was when the money was being sought / offered. It would be totally incorrect to retrospectively decide years later that this money carried new conditions.

Calina

oppenheimer1 wrote: »

Just an aside, you have to wonder why he'd be objecting. The concerts would have no effect on him, living as he does about 4km from the stadium.

I live 4km from Croke Park although not in Cuffe's neighbourhood. You're incorrect to say that being 4km away means the concerts would have no effect. I hear the noise from every concert at Croke Park. I hear the cheers when Dublin scores. And by and large, I actually can live with that to some extent.

What's monumentally annoying is the traffic most of which comes in the M1 and via the M50. I just don't bother trying to leave the house unless I absolutely have to. Main routes into the city centre are generally borderline non moving, people ratrace and park in housing estates. Plus any bus that goes anywhere near the stadium is completely packed. For me, that's actually anything city-centrewards.

I think the DCC decision was fair enough under the circumstances because at least those concerts didn't impact rush hour traffic on the north side.

The two that were scheduled on the Monday and Tuesday would have caused mayhem and it would have impacted people living 4km away from the stadium.

I didn't object by the way. I probably would the next time since it appears necessary to convince people that there is an issue, even 4 km away from the stadium. I don't mind the football and hurling so much because in general, it's one day, occasionally 2, in a row and almost always at weekends. And it doesn't generate the same level of noise.

I'm sorry for people who had tickets. But it's obvious to me that many people who have tickets are just suggesting people who live in the area have no rights and should just suck it up.

Little CuChulainn

Calina wrote: »

I'm sorry for people who had tickets. But it's obvious to me that many people who have tickets are just suggesting people who live in the area have no rights and should just suck it up.

I don't have tickets and I think that. I mean, if you have an issue with traffic or crowds, don't live in a city center. If you have an issue with noise, don't live near a stadium.

SpaceTime

The big problem is that we didn't construct a major national event centre somewhere sensible.

I'd have picked somewhere in Kildare with major access into the M7 (multiple flyovers), a huge amount of parking, plenty of space to park coaches and its own railway station with a short branch off the Cork line and multiple platforms.

That way you'd be able to get loads of people in and out without clogging up a city centre location with inadequate road network even for normal traffic most of the time.

I suppose the main thing though was to ensure the GAA had its enormous HQ.

A major stadium that was being used regularly would create more jobs, be a real national asset and quite useful for hosting everything from major concerts to sporting events.

It also should be built for both concerts and sport. Not just adding concerts as an afterthought.

All a bit late now though!

syklops

Is the thread title not a bit misleading?

The articles I have read suggest FF have done more for Brook than anyone.

For Reals

syklops wrote: »

Is the thread title not a bit misleading?

The articles I have read suggest FF have done more for Brook than anyone.

That may be true. While it is embarrassing for Fianna Fáil die hards, who get what they deserve, the Toaiseach getting involved is embarrassing for the entire country.

SpaceTime

There's actually very little the Taoiseach can do anyway.

We don't live in a dictatorship. The PM can't just suddenly declare the concert playable.

We have laws, rules, legal processes etc etc that have to be gone through.

All the Taoiseach can really do is try and negotiate a compromise within the existing framework of rules and regulations. That seems unlikely though.

raymon

syklops wrote: »

Is the thread title not a bit misleading?

The articles I have read suggest FF have done more for Brook than anyone.

I agree . Emergency bills to give politicians more p power in planning matters. No thanks Fianna Fail.

SpaceTime

raymon wrote: »

I agree . Emergency bills to give politicians more p power in planning matters. No thanks Fianna Fail.

I'd actually go further than that. If I see any emergency bills for the sake of a single concert that give politicians control of planning regulations, I will be voting against any party involved FF, FG or Labour.

Pure populism is what this is and it's the very thing that destroyed this country several times.

syklops

For Reals wrote: »

That may be true. While it is embarrassing for Fianna Fáil die hards, who get what they deserve, the Toaiseach getting involved is embarrassing for the entire country.

What has the taoiseach done though?

Permabear

This post has been deleted.

oppenheimer1

Permabear wrote: »

This post had been deleted.

The proposed idea was utterly daft, and only designed to shift the political heat from DCC back to brooks camp, since they can now say they offered a "compromise".

Sand

On the bright side, I think the DCC have been fairly impressive in being firm but fair. They approved three concerts and have held firm since despite a frankly laughable hysteria being whipped up by the media and gombeen men. Good on them.

Garth Brooks, I don't know what to think about. I've no personal or even artistic dislike for the man, but he seems to have performed an interesting trick in that it was him who cancelled the concerts, not the DCC, yet he's not under any pressure apparently. I don't like that he seems to think he can issue ultimatums to Ireland or negotiate directly with our government. By "don't like" I mean he can **** right off.

He does have a valid point regarding promoters selling tickets for concerts that lack planning permission. From his perspective it must seem like DCC suddenly showed up late in the day - he's not seeing that it was actually the promoters and the GAA, with great big brass necks, thinking they could ignore the rules and bully their way through by not seeking approval until the last second. They hoped the DCC wouldn't have the stones to uphold the law. Like I said, good on the DCC. Maybe next time promoters will get the approval first, then sell the tickets.

As for Enda and his involvement in this laughable media circus - I gave up on him a long time ago. Enda is the Roy Hodgson of Ireland politics. 'Woy is only England manager because he is not 'Arry Redknapp. Enda is Taoiseach only because he is not Bertie. He otherwise possesses no qualifications or personal attributes that would entitle him to rise beyond the station of the office errand boy. He is just a dull gombeen man. The Irish media are also shown up for what they are - not truth seekers, just noise makers. You'd get better quality of reporting of newsworthy Irish issues and events from the BBC.

Ash.J.Williams

There is only one solution.... Let the 5 gigs go ahead and penalize Aiken/gaa. ..or else just forget it ever happened.... The politicians need to stop coming up with embarrassing ideas asap.

Permabear

This post has been deleted.

dubrov

Permabear wrote: »

This post had been deleted.

Sure, Garth Brooks had no one to turn to who could fill him in.
He then graciously agreed to talk to the political leader of a nation.

I think Enda Kenny made a big mistake getting involved and trying to influence the planning process

Permabear

This post has been deleted.

dubrov

I think all politicians should stay out of it (opposition aside, who have little to lose and much to gain).
If the planning laws are unfair, change them. The ship has already sailed on this issue

Garth is still trying to ratchet up the pressure though:

"“Our guys are still en route and if there is any chance that the five planned concerts can be salvaged and nobody is being let down then we can proceed as planned until the refunds begin."

I can see a late turnaround from Garth where he agrees to do the 3 concerts "for the fans".

raymon

dubrov wrote: »

I think Enda Kenny made a big mistake getting involved and trying to influence the planning process

I dont believe he did anything of the sort .... did he?

What did he do?

That_Girl_ Is_ A_Cowboy

Permabear wrote: »

This post had been deleted.

Can I add something.

The cancellations would be huge. I believe 28 million was spent on tickets. The ticketholders would need refunding. Garth Brooks would more than likely still get payed and the sum due to him was 10 million. That could very well sink Aiken down. If you have a look at the aiken promotions site, they are promoting many, many acts so there could be a domino effect yet.

That_Girl_ Is_ A_Cowboy

Permabear wrote: »

This post had been deleted.

I think the 5 concerts over 3 days would have breached one of the conditions as one of the conditions attached to the licence was no music before 6pm.

flatty

Godge wrote: »

That is an easy one. The wider public interest for economic development, environmental protection, public infrastructure and social amenities beyond the narrow interests of those directly affected by the proposal.

This public interest is too frequently ignored in Ireland.

No, the pylon project should go ahead. Ludicrously, many of those objecting do so on the basis that the pylons will pass too near their houses but also the pylons are detrimental to the visual amenity for tourism purposes!!! The answer is either

(1) They are talking rubbish
(2) Their houses are also detrimental to the visual amenity (unless they are centuries old cottages) and should therefore be demolished.

Again, people claim detrimental environmental effects from the windfarms - noise, visual etc. yet the continuing detrimental effects from burning coal are far higher.

Yes

Just because you think an airport in the midlands is a good idea doesn't mean anyone else does.

There are already too many airports in Ireland. The only possible expansions that make any economic sense are

(1) another runway at Dublin Airport to make full use of the new overly expensive terminal
(2) Baldonnel as a second airport for Dublin

International law comes into play unfortunately, otherwise you would have a point.

Again, the UK is a sovereign nation, nothing we can do, except through EU environmental law (which we have tried) and ineffectual lobbying (which we have also tried)

We do tell them whether or not they can land in Shannon. We give them full permission. What is your issue on this?

If it worked the way you wanted it to, nothing would ever get done or built.

Good post, but I think you entirely missed his point.

foggy_lad

What a poxy hole of a country Ireland really is!

Not only have we will been raped over a barrel for the next several hundred years by gombeen men developers who gambled and abused planning laws all over the shop but now we are letting international singing sensations dictate planning laws and overturn legitimate planning decisions of state agencies!

Sorry if the above seems harsh but the reality is those shows should never have been advertised nor tickets sold without planning permission. Promoters of such events are doing the same wheeler dealing as the developers and other crooks did before the boom and selling what is not in their possession and which might never happen.

Permabear

This post has been deleted.

Tabnabs

Permabear wrote: »

This post had been deleted.

No, but it's not just some bloke who turns up with his band and off he goes. He has a management team & promoters (Major Bob Music) who deal with the paperwork and handle the details. Brooks is the product, finely crafted and very well polished. Brooks team and Aiken have been putting out a very high level of spin to make them the victim in this process. Aiken has told a number of lies in radio interviews to slant the argument in his favour. Brooks press conference with its dramatic pauses, soul searching sighs and heart felt pleas, all very carefully crafted to deflect any criticism away from them for pulling the rug on the entire showcase.

Brooks may not need Ireland, but he will miss the revenue on 400,000 tickets, merchandise and album sales.

Permabear

This post has been deleted.

Calina

Permabear wrote: »

This post had been deleted.

So he disappointed them all instead.

Permabear

This post has been deleted.