Fescue wrote: » By losing one of their last 14 games. Spectacular!
redbaron_99 wrote: » What? Liverpool didn't collapse at the end of the season....? Not having a pop at you, but they collapsed in fairly spectacular fashion.
Fescue wrote: » It could be said but it would be off the mark.
rarnes1 wrote: » When's the Champions league draw?
redbaron_99 wrote: » Same could be said for Liverpool at the end of last season...
Fescue wrote: » They still have tiny little balls. Which means they collapse whenever they're tested.
noodler wrote: » I definitely agree with you on this one. 1) Wenger is proven - Rodgers far, far less so by comparison. 2) Question marks about how Liverpool will fare with the CL and league whereas last season they had just the league. 3) Unsure how Liverpool will cope without Suarez - Arsenal have shown they can cope with losing their best players and still safely qualify for the CL. 4) Arsenal's squad does look better atm imo. Taking Suarez away and adding Sanchez to Arsenal really has that see-saw effect imo.
RasTa wrote: » Compared the squads and managers and it's easy to see why Sanchez would choose Arsenal * *based on Suarez leaving too.
googled eyes wrote: » Apparently BVB are after Origi also. This may not end well for us
Hyzepher wrote: » Do you guys really believe that the Sanchez deal was all about living in London rather that Liverpool? I'd guess the decision was a bit more football related than you guys would like to believe.
Hyzepher wrote: » So failing to win the league then?
Fizman wrote: » Competing for a league title until the final day. How bout you guys?
djPSB wrote: » Give them £40m for the lols.
googled eyes wrote: » Wilfred Bony chatter is picking up. Swansea want > £20M
Hyzepher wrote: » Nah, sure he'll be lifting trophies in May. What were you guys doing last May?
Turtyturd wrote: » Having February to August off each year?