sickmyduck wrote: » Now lets say i was 32 and not 23 and had my 12 year old son with me and was buying my weekly shop would she still not serve me cause the 12 year old did not have ID
zarquon wrote: » If you are in a purchasing group albeit a small one, everyone in the group needs to have ID. .
ekimiam wrote: » Does it say that, exactly, anywhere in law? dont think so , they are being over cautious about it. they have always had strange policies , when they opened first they insisted the would only take a Garda age card for id, I refused to get one, and they refused me alcohol when I produced my passport.
Bepolite wrote: » Because the only defence available to selling alcohol on an off-licence to a minor is that a Garda age card was produced. Not a strange policy in the slightest really.
ekimiam wrote: » what ? i wasnt a minor, and whats that do for defence?
ekimiam wrote: » its a very strange request, that no other drink selling establishment I ever encountered enforced.
ekimiam wrote: » but there selling it to me! who is on record on a passport not to be a minor! wheres the difficulty there? no other OFF LICENCE of any description (ie drink selling ) I ever encountered enforced this. and i dont think lidl did for long either
ekimiam wrote: » Intoxicating Liquor Act, 1988, section 31 4) In any proceedings against a person for a contravention of subsection (1) or (2) of this section, it shall be a defence for such person to prove that the person in respect of whom the charge is brought produced to him an age card relating to such person or that he had other reasonable grounds for believing that such person was over the age of 18 years, or, if the person is charged with permitting another person to sell or deliver intoxicating liquor contrary to the said subsection (1) or (2), to prove that an age card was produced by the person concerned to that other person or that that other person had other reasonable grounds for believing as aforesaid. the bit i find interesting is "or that he had other reasonable grounds for believing that such person was over the age of 18 years" would a passport not be reasonable grounds? as reasonable as an age card ?
ekimiam wrote: » Does it say that, exactly, anywhere in law? dont think so , they are being over cautious about it..
zarquon wrote: » The law is the law and anyone buying booze needs ID. If you are in a purchasing group albeit a small one, everyone in the group needs to have ID. .
mikom wrote: » Even the toddler in the shopping trolley seat.........
jonny24ie wrote: » You never know, stewie Griffin might have used a mind altering ray gun to get Louis to buy him drink..... you can't trust no one these days, not even the toddlers
meathstevie wrote: » It's an offence to supply drink to minors and that's supplying in all manners possible, including for example giving a 15 year old a can at family barbecue.
conorh91 wrote: » The Intoxicating Liquor Acts leave plenty of room for common sense on this. It is not an offence to sell alcohol to a person in respect of whom there is no reason to believe the alcohol will be supplied to a minor outside the premises Having said that, if a mother rocked up to the checkout with her toddler and a bottle of Dutchy, and said "it sends him right off to sleep, last thing at night" it may be lawful to sell the alcohol in that rather unique situation, since the alcohol is intended for supply to a minor in a private dwelling.
Cookie_Monster wrote: » so where is the line then? What about a parent with their 15 year old son doing the weekly shop... or if he's 17, 10, 8 etc etc
auldgranny wrote: » This happened to my daughter and her friend once. They were both 20 but only one of them had ID. I have to be honest I was delighted they had taken such a stand on it. It was in my daughter's best interest.
wolfyboy555 wrote: » does anyone else notice employees asking if a customer is over 18 when they clearly are? ...