Ferris_Bueller wrote: » I'd personally prefer Di Maria than Sanchez or at least consider him on a par, would love to see Liverpool go all out and get him but can't see it happening. Realistically if Real Madrid want rid of him he is going to leave, and there are only so many clubs who could take him. Would probably be more likely to go to someone like Juventus or PSG before us though.
Fescue wrote: » If Di Maria is available I think you'll see clubs like Utd, Bayern, Chelsea, City, PSG making a move, unfortunately for us. But you never know so put in a big offer and see if others are willing to match it.
Hotfail.com wrote: » Why would you put UTD in the same bracket as the rest of them? I'd imagine UTD are just as unattractive this year as we were a few years ago when we weren't doing so well, albeit they've a far more attractive manager than Dalglish/Hodgson were.
Fescue wrote: » Lets not kid ourselves, they are a massive club. Plus they have the financial means to compete with most others.
Hotfail.com wrote: » I dunno, I just think players look more at the current situation than past achievements. Inter for example would have been a massive club a few years ago but now they can't attract anyone too big.
Agent Coulson wrote: » There not really one year out of the CL is nothing a new manager who is in the World Cup semi final and they can offer huge wages would still be a huge draw for players.
Hotfail.com wrote: » Probably just wishful thinking on my part :rolleyes: I still have high hopes for their financial meltdown though! :pac:
redbaron_99 wrote: » The Chevrolet sponsorship is worth £50 million per year. (£350 over 7 years) The new kit deal is rumoured to be worth £75 million per year (£750 over 10 years). This on top of profits of £146.4 million in 2013, which is expected to rise in 2014. I think you are writing United's obituary a little too soon.
Gbear wrote: » I dunno about much better, but certainly on a par. I don't know what the actual stats are but my impression is that Sanchez is a better dribbler (which is an aspect of play we've obviously lost with Suarez) but he's slower and a worse finisher. But I don't think Barca want to sell Pedro (obviously with good reason). Di Maria would be a great signing. He's proven he has what it takes for Real season after season and they keep on buying players. Don't know why they don't just trust him. He wouldn't replace the goals but he's an absolute assist machine. He's a bit of a git, but at least he doesn't bite people.
woodyg wrote: » this will go down like a tone of bricks but i actually would tip Utd for the league next season. i honestly believe we will be battling Arsenal for 4th spot.
8-10 wrote: » Can see it happening. Think Chelsea will be the team to beat though
woodyg wrote: » this will go down like a tone of bricks but i actually would tip Utd for the league next season.
Fescue wrote: » The majority of that will go to service the clubs debt to be fair.
redbaron_99 wrote: » Sorry, but you're very far off the mark with that.
In total, over £696m has gone towards interest fees, bank charges and debt repayment, with £382.9m invested in players – from the £2m signing of Edwin van der Sar a month after the takeover to the £37.1m club-record purchase of Juan Mata last month.
0028673 wrote: » Just spotted this on twitter... not sure if it's his real account but it gives more reason for disliking the guy :mad: Guillem Balague @GuillemBalague · 1h Been told Arsenal will pay less than 30m for Alexis. Lallana was 25. Fair valuation u think considering age, goal record, experience? ReplyReplied to 0 times RetweetRetweeted 1,452 times1.5K FavoriteFavorited 452 times452 More
Fescue wrote: » Since the Glazers took over...
Lojak wrote: » Mans a spoofer if I ever saw one, cant understand how he has the standing he has.
