superg wrote: » Why not have it in Marlay Park. Nobody over there seems to complain and its better suited for transport being close to the M50 etc.
Knock Off Nigel wrote: » Residents are 100% to blame bitter bitter people
Wishiwasa Littlebitaller wrote: » DCC admit they offered to grant licences for 4 nights, but only if Brooks agreed but would only offer 3 if he didn't! That's a disgrace, as it means they were only willing to say they offered 3 licences to save face. If they were willing to offer 4, then they should have made that public, not wait until the GAA / Aitken made the announcement. The council's actions are a joke and I believe what Aiken / GAA are saying now, where are had doubted it but the only ones backtracking and contradicting themselves now is the DCC.
paddyirish23 wrote: » Lord mayor of dublin on TV3 begging brooks to come back to sort this out..
SoCal MusicLover wrote: » Good, I don't want to come visit your country. Going to Norway & Sweden instead.
Reekwind wrote: » Did you ever wonder what 'subject to licence' means when gigs are advertised? It means that every major concert follows the exact same practice as Aiken. Logistics, and slow Council responses, dictate this. Yet you'd have us believe that every major gig in the country this summer is "illegal"?
Happyman42 wrote: » How so? DCC canncelled two illegitimate concerts legally. Garth Brooks cancelled 3 legitimate concerts.
Harry Angstrom wrote: » Would anybody like to buy one of these? 110% cotton, 40% polyester. I ordered 10,000 of them
Woodville56 wrote: » The Dublin Lord Mayor on RTE News pleading - "Gareth", come back, we need you !! Jesus wept !! What a load of baloney !!
SoCal MusicLover wrote: » You folks are lovely people. Really gonna miss these good times.
Fortyjocks wrote: » Deafening silence from the Brooks camp - no message for the children he has abandoned for the first three nights! At least we know now it was a threat and not a genuine concern for the fans! Anyway I hope all those with expenses for the first three Licensed concerts are forming an orderly queue at the small claims court!
horseburger wrote: » I think Garth Brooks didn't want to be in a situation of going along with a ruling where fans going to the 4th and 5th shows would miss out, through no fault of theirs, if the first three went ahead.
hynesie08 wrote: » Link?
Max Headroom wrote: » What ar we going to do..........:eek:..........millions of euro lost......ehh..NO, thats millions of euros not leaving the country...
Rojomcdojo wrote: » And everyone who had a ticket for the last 2 nights should seek a refund from the residents? This whole fiasco is an absolute embarrassment, crazy decisions made by a civil servant who would probably struggle to land a job in McDonald's were he not making a mint costing the economy 10's of millions in the process. Embarrassing.