mosstin wrote: » £75 million for Suarez is a fantastic price.
joe123 wrote: » Not going to make a blind bit of difference to the supporter if its not reinvested in the right players. Look at Spurs. Currently we are looking at Sturridge, Lambert and Borini as our striker options. Yucky.
joe123 wrote: » Jackson Martinez anyone? Cannot understand how he couldnt get a game for Columbia. When he did play he took his goals really well.
mosstin wrote: » It gives us a serious warchest to reinvest with. Course it makes a difference.
Hotfail.com wrote: » Anyone else have a really good feeling Borini will come good this year?
billy2012 wrote: » Would love MArtinez, a goal scoring machine like Bony!! Whats the craic with Marco Reus?? Wouldn't mind splashing big on him!!
billy2012 wrote: » Whats the craic with Marco Reus?? Wouldn't mind splashing big on him!!
joe123 wrote: » Think you need to take note of the IF in my post.
RainMaker wrote: » I thought he had joined the priesthood!
rarnes1 wrote: » The price on Sanchez going to Juventus is shortening by the hour. Hard to know if there's anything in it
Fescue wrote: » That's way over the top in my opinion. Goals are the most decisive thing in football and in that respect Falcao was more imprtant to Atletico than Suarez to Liverpool. Atletico found a way to be better, thanks to Simeone, without Falcao. Rodgers, who is far more important to Liverpool than Suarez, will hopefully do the same.
klose wrote: » Not one of the usual digs exchanged between us and arsenal fans but i wouldn't be surprised if he rathered a move to turin, already knows italian, knows the league aswell as vidal and isla being there too he already has a couple of mates there.
Morzadec wrote: » I watched both players extensively both seasons and I just think you are way off the mark comparing the impact and influence each player had on each teams' season. Falcon was a highly effective cog in a well functioning team, he is a fairly one-dimensional player. He got one assist in that season. Suarez was an attacking, winning machine, a player basically impossible to stop because he can hurt you in so many ways. It will be very interesting to see how the likes of Sturridge and Sterling perform without Suarez. Not to mention the assists Suarez provides, but the confidence he inspires and the space he makes for others purely because he attracts so much attention will be something they will have to manage without. Costa came in and had at least as good as a season as Falcao (probably better to be honest). Now nobody saw that coming to be fair but it was always possible as Falcao didn't set the bar insanely high. It's hard to predict things in football but I will have no problem predicting that no one will come close to matching the output, the performances and the importance of Suarez next season. Unless we sign Ronaldo or Messi it simply won't happen!
rossie1977 wrote: » All reports in Spain suggest Barca are paying nowhere near that. British journalists getting Euro and pounds mixed up again more than likely. With it coming out today that a deal has been in place since last november and Liverpool trying to back out (when they saw how good he was playing) that again points to a much lower fee than reported. And if barca pay cash I would be very surprised, staggered deal over 5 years.
mosstin wrote: » So you're going with the Spanish press on this one? The article you're alluding to contained quotes from the Uruguay manager that have since been rubbished. The veracity of the rest of it can probably be called into question too.
rossie1977 wrote: » All reports in Spain suggest Barca are paying nowhere near that. British journalists getting Euro and pounds mixed up again more than likely. With it coming out today that a deal has been in place since last november and Liverpool trying to back out (when they saw how good he was playing) that again points to a much lower fee than reported. And if barca pay cash I would be very surprised, staggered deal over a number of years as is their usual stance
gordongekko wrote: » I'd say that was about 10 million too much to pay for sterling.
Nuri Sahin wrote: » Ah swell, positivity as ever sweeps into the Liverpool thread. It's not like Barca centric media or Barca to claim lower figures for transfers in, example... NEYMAR. No siree. All the reliable journos are saying £70-80M, and yet, some wish to take the word of the fecking Spanish media.
Hotfail.com wrote: » Reus is going to United, remember, along with Kroos and Robben? :rolleyes:
MD1990 wrote: » Id take the risk & go fo Balotelli. Has huge potential & Roders could help him fufill it.
NukaCola wrote: » I believe BR could get the best out of him, has the potential to be amazing....a lot of work would need to be done for him to fit in and it could be worth it, but its a massive gamble, one i wouldn't take personally.
Utopia Parkway wrote: » Echo reporting that Sanchez told Liverpool his family would prefer to live in London. Not much else the club could have done on that one it seems.
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://w1.vanillicon.com/v2/11f397efbb618f280f346771bb290fe0.svg)
