Nuri Sahin wrote: » 5) The club have very high hopes for Markovic. 6) [b["No one at Anfield is convinced by Mingolet.. Doesn't talk, doesn't come for crosses, doesn't sweep. If they can get anyone better they will" No one at Anfield is convinced by him."[/b] 7) "Cast-iron buyout, Fighting was not an issue this summer", re: Suarez 8) Agger is a goner. 9) "Off to Napoli on a free (or close)", re: Reina 10) Laughed off Balotelli to Liverpool stories basically.
Turtyturd wrote: » It's like everyone at the club watched Germany V Algeria together then looked at each other and asked 'Why doesn't our keeper do that? Get rid of him.'
Hotfail.com wrote: » Jesus I wouldn't want a keeper doing that! I'd be a nervous wreck everytime a team starts attacking :pac:
Pyjamarama wrote: » Am I the only one super excited by markovic? I understand that people want big name signings but this guy gas the potential to be a true superstar. Good enough that we could be dealing with real players telling us that it's always been his dream to play there in a few years. I'll take that kind of potential
beakerjoe wrote: » I think after the lose of Suarez, potential is not whats needed. a proven goalscorer is.
Agent Coulson wrote: » I'll be honest I don't know a huge amount about him but at £20m I would expect him to be starting week in week out. I would also expect Lallana to be starting week in week out so with these two alone I'm finding it hard to see the shape of the team next season and who will be droped. I thinking it could be 3 5 2 system.
Turtyturd wrote: » Exactly...spending some of the money on potential is fine but there needs to be one or two signings who can step in now to fill the giant void left in the squad.
smileyj1987 wrote: » But is there a huge void being created by selling him ? This is his third ban . He seems to get one every season . LFC needs players who can play every game of the season . I know injuries happen but every one of his bans has been avoidable .
Pyjamarama wrote: » I just don't see why these guys with potential can't contribute now too. Take sterling as an example, if we signed him for 20m would you be disappointed?
Soft Falling Rain wrote: » All the top teams in the league have players on the bench every week who are either highly rated or who cost a pretty penny. If nothing else our bench will actually have some enticing options, something that has been painfully not been the case over the past few years.
gordongekko wrote: » I'd say that was about 10 million too much to pay for sterling.
Pyjamarama wrote: » Am I the only one super excited by markovic?
Pyjamarama wrote: » You think Sterling is only worth 10m?!? I wouldn't sell him for less than 30 and even then I'd rather not.