Utopia Parkway wrote: » We can't make the player come to Liverpool if he doesn't want to. I agree though that we should be making it clear that the Suarez deal is dependent on them not selling Sanchez to Arsenal at the very least.
wonderfullife wrote: » There's a case to be made for Spurs having messed up not demanding a similar situation with Bale/Ozil last year. I.e. take Bale but for gods sake no selling anybody to Man U/Liverpool/arsenal/city/Chelsea thank you.
Skylinehead wrote: » Actually, Levy did try it. Perez pretty much laughed in his face.
klose wrote: » On paper at the time spurs spent the bale money really well i thought, obviously didnt turn out well for em but i would have had any of the players they signed at the time. All the fees were realisitic aswell.
Morzadec wrote: » They remind me a lot of the Aspas and Alberto signings in all the above regards.
Pyjamarama wrote: » Some of the stuff here is comical. Do people really think that we could demand they don't sell Sanchez to arsenal?!? That's schoolyard stuff. It's up there with Ireland asking to be added to the World Cup...
gimli2112 wrote: » it was a handball HANDBALL FIFA Michel Platini Sepp No corruption I can't get over it
Utopia Parkway wrote: » Nearly everyone thought Spurs spent brilliantly last Summer. Sure they entered the season with praise ringing in their ears and highly fancied to get a CL spot. What derailed them was troubles with their manager, Lamela barely kicking a ball for them and Soldado more or less flopping. Despite all that they still managed only 3 points less than the season before when Bale was performing heroics every week and finished only one position down the league than the season before (and that was only because we shot up from 7th to 2nd).
joe123 wrote: » Can - £10 million Lallana - £25 million Lambert - £4 million Markovich - £25 million Origi - £10 million Combined total there of 74 million which uses up the Suarez fee. I know there is a long way to go in the summer window and I HOPE that FSG are actually going to invest some funds and not just spend the Suarez money but so far, thats 5 signings and not one of them would be considered a first team starter. If the above are added for strength in depth then great but we seriously need to add one or two players that would be considered a level above. In my eyes we have over spent by about 10 million on Lallana and I am puzzled about the Markovich signing. Scored 5 goals last season for benfica and we are paying the guts of 25 million for him. If you add in the £20 million for Lovren....I am not liking the way this window is going.
joe123 wrote: » Can - £10 millionLallana - £25 million instead of Allen Lambert - £4 millionMarkovich - £25 million instead of Suarez Origi - £10 million
naughtb4 wrote: » I would imagine both would be starters, or at the very least will play a part in 75% or our games
greendom wrote: » It was an error by the ref. Get over it !
joe123 wrote: » Markovich instead of Suarez? Ah no. 5 goals in the Portuguese league replacing the third best player in the world? No I do not like the sound of that! If we signed Markovich for 10 million no one would expect him to start. Its only the fee that has people thinking it. Lallana replacing Allen is a possibility I suppose but I could see Lallana rotating with Coutinho/Allen/Henderson and even Sterling from time to time instead of outright replacing any of them.
gucci wrote: » if we were added to it now it would be a fair deal i reckon!
gosplan wrote: » It'd make Liverpool a laughing stick tbh.
Nuri Sahin wrote: » Markovic is the new Erikson now.