HardLuckWoman wrote: » You'd swear there was going to be stabbings like the phoenix park. Christ.
munstermagic11 wrote: » If you feel that the agreement is ridiculous, fair enough. But why can't you then criticize those that tried to force through another 5 before ever changing it?
bennyl10 wrote: » ^^^^^ THIS Its 8 nights, in a stadium used will we say,about 15 times max a year? If residents in places like thomond can take a match every second week for most of the year and a concert, surely so can they.. God forbid they'd a match every second week..
nm wrote: » That's still only 8 nights. So what? It's the best and biggest stadium the the country, the 3 gig a year agreement is ridiculous and if anything, that's what should be reviewed.
mikom wrote: » On top of 3 nights for "One Direction" plus the clatter of GAA matches.
mikom wrote: » Were you ever in bed with a fella and he whispered in your ear......."Ah, please, just the tip, I promise".
HardLuckWoman wrote: » The 3 nights of One Direction is over. Its in the past. Just (maybe) 5 more. All over in august.
salmocab wrote: » Its not only five nights though its eight this year and sure next year it will be ten nights of the Beatles comeback it has to stop somewhere.
nm wrote: » Do you have it in you to admit that if you were one of the 70k travelling from overseas for this, or one of the 160,000 with a ticket for it, how the actions of these residents might be considered just a little selfish? Aikens may have done wrong but they didn't stop the gig. It's only 5 nights. It's 160,000 people put out and having to cancel their plans.
nm wrote: » It's only 5 nights.
HardLuckWoman wrote: » I dont know. Ask the croke park mafia residents. They were threatening crap for months. They did not have to wait for DCC decision to seek an injunction, apparently. Mentioned in some article last week. They dragged dragged it out just as much.
homerjk wrote: » Why do people keep ignoring the fact that it is Gareth Brooks who is stopping 400,000 drunken fools. The council only stopped 160,000. So Gareth is the one f**king over the other 240,000. Am I missing something here?
salmocab wrote: » When did Aiken apply for the license?
Aiken wrote: In the case of the Garth Brooks event Aiken Promotions submitted the licence application on 17 April 2014
Jamsiek wrote: » They did nothing wrong
hynesie08 wrote: » A court injunction against what though? How can you get something stopped that legally doesn't exist! They'd be laughed outta court if they tried that.
nm wrote: » The residents are to blame, selfish, tunnel vision, no regard for 160,000 other people or the damage they're doing to stop a few people walking on "their" street
Steven71 wrote: » Lol, I've seen "subject to license" on my outdoor concert tickets, just automatically thought all that would have been sorted BEFORE the tickets went on sale.