Mr.S wrote: » This is the tweet the outlets are basing their "breaking news" onhttps://twitter.com/raymcadam/status/484632556726669312 DCC however have publicly said nothing has been said. Odd.
bennyl10 wrote: » No. Licences are never granted before tickets go on sale. Every single event is subject to license. This is not aikens fault!
slingerz wrote: » They may simply move the 2 other concerts to somewhere else really
Leroy42 wrote: » Whichever way this goes it shows how totally unfair the current system is. DCC are now caught between the residents and the people who have bought and paid for tickets, and all the additional travel requirements. Promotors should not be allowed sell tickets until such time as they have permission. That will force the promotors to get everything squared before the event is announced. SUre ticketmaster have recevied their cut already, Aiken promo have had the cash for months. everybody wins, except those who lose out I guess!
bennyl10 wrote: » Swapped tickets? Ticketmaster will give you a refund if you bought a ticket from them for a cancelled show.(if cancelled)
Leroy42 wrote: » totally Aikens fault, who else would you blame The residetns are simply standing up for the agreement, DCC are simply upholding that agreement. You hardly blame the punters? Whilst it may be the accepted norm, it seems (if the story is true that Aiken has been caught out this time
Mr.S wrote: » https://twitter.com/davemolloy/status/484641144559898624 Very odd! And nothing on the DCC weekly planning site (it's usually updated fast)
HardLuckWoman wrote: » If they paid by cash. What if they paid by card?
bennyl10 wrote: » Aiken followed the agreement.. I thought this had been thoroughly explained to people?! The agreement said permission must be sought, they did that! Noone is,really at serious fault..aiken did their job correctly, PER THE AGREEMENT, DCC made a decision due to the opposition to the gigs,. aiken caught out by following the law? Ah stop looking to.pick a fight, especially when nothing has been confirmed.
hynesie08 wrote: » Which, in the case of outdoor concerts, Is apparently illegal. If that's the case,. kinda Aikens fault
but1er wrote: » Absoulte disgrace! The amount of money this country will lose out! Hope there happly
bennyl10 wrote: » Illegal? Sure 3 are being awarded, and look marlay park is going ahead, and so is electric picnic, and longitude, and every outdoor event in this country!! Illegal? Pfft? DCC.listened to.objections and licenced 3 not 5,noone is saying the law has been broken. Simply. Noone is being arrested for selling tickets as per normal!
Effects wrote: » It's not all about money. You need to learn that.
sunbabe08 wrote: » hard luck woman should change her name is lucky woman.
hynesie08 wrote: » Thing is though, According to the outdoor events act 2001?, Promoting events without a license is an offence, So if the residents can use it as a defence, Maybe someone can bring aiken through small claims for it?