taidghbaby wrote: » Meh....united fans were talking about playing 12 players in their thread the other night, so why not?
Grayditch wrote: » Imminent Howard Webb joke...
Birroc wrote: » Maybe it's just me but I not think Suarez himself wants to play for Liverpool again. I think his superb performances last year were about him getting in the shop window again. I don't think he ever had real Liverpool loyalty and I don't think he has much time for Rodgers. Just my theory.
redbaron_99 wrote: » Players with loyalty to a specific club are few and far between these days. I would say Suarez is about as loyal to Liverpool as he was to Ajax.
Seaba wrote: » Yes. Not going to happen, so don't sell him. If he is going Falcao/Aguero/players of that ilk must be bought to replace him. Not going to happen, so don't sell him.
8-10 wrote: » He'll be back there though...http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/football/transfers/luis-suarez-liverpool-striker-says-he-wants-to-return-to-ajax-but-not-for-a-while-9339848.html
Sappy404 wrote: » From @betfairpoker:
Turtyturd wrote: » If Lallana was worth 25 million they'd be comparing the egg to him.
redbaron_99 wrote: » I'm sure he will
According to my sources it's between Liverpool and a new improved contract with Bayern for Xherdan Shaqiri
Dont be at yourself wrote: » This lad's a bit of a spoofer, but: Tor-Kristian Karlsen @karlsentk 7m Not too enthused by the prospect, tbh.
Birroc wrote: » Maybe it's just me but I do not think Suarez himself wants to play for Liverpool again. I think his superb performances last year were about him getting in the shop window again. I don't think he ever had real Liverpool loyalty and I don't think he has much time for Rodgers. Just my theory.
Francie Barrett wrote: » It seems like there's too much smoke without fire to suggest that Barcelona aren't making a move for Suarez. Like someone else stated earlier, the real question is what exactly was said to Suarez last Summer when he signed the contract. If we promised him he could leave this time, then we really don't have a leg to stand on. The next question then is, if we've going to let him leave, then what's the story with the release clause. I've seen all sorts of speculation on this from £52M to £70M. Even with Suarez's ban, we should be standing firm on this. The player is quite clearly in the top 3 of attackers in the world an if Real and Barcelona are both interested, then they should expect to have to pay top whack. Finally, if the player goes, then no swap deals please. Give us all the money upfront and we can talk about Sanchez at that point.
rarnes1 wrote: » This is based on nothing. I watched every Liverpool game last season and I can't remember a player actually caring as much as he did.
whatawaster wrote: » Sanchez is one of if not the best attacking player we could hope for this summer. We have to make him part of the deal and make him coming to us a condition of any sale. That gives us a huge advantage over Arsenal and Juventus as Barca won't want to derail the Suarez deal.
Spring Onion wrote: » Maybe so but why didn't he apologise directly to Liverpool FC who will take the brunt of the 4 month ban? "I apologise to Gieogio Chiellini and the entire football family" #1 because he has no notion of staying and #2 because he feels he owes Liverpool nothing.
MonkeyTennis wrote: » Its strange Liverpool have kept so silent. That leads me to believe a deal will be done. Just before the world cup Suarez said that he wouldnt be moving so it seems the owners have lost patience with him. I dont believe Brendan would want to let him go so Im guessing he has been also advised to stay silent on the subject. We should have been drooling at being back in the Champions League with one of the best forward lines in Europe and and an improved squad but instead we are playing a guessing game and I for one am sick of the whole thing.
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://w1.vanillicon.com/v2/11f397efbb618f280f346771bb290fe0.svg)
