Judgement Day wrote: » I doubt that he'll go hungry.
Judgement Day wrote: » Noticeable in today's news reporting of Tony O'Reilly's financial woes that he has already been stripped of his title (by the media). Wouldn't have happened back in the day when he owned a sizeable chunk of it. Once the darling of the Irish business and social scene the bold Sir Anthony Joseph Francis O'Reilly is finally on queer street. It's hard to feel much sympathy for the man given the devastation that his shenanigans have caused to the many thousands of workers who lost their jobs down the years The UK pottery industry (Royal Doulton amongst others), Waterford Glass and more bore the brunt of his mismanagement -and don't be fooled by all the old bull about how he and his family kept Waterford Wedgwood going. What about the rest of us ordinary shareholders. :mad: Anyway, goodbye Tony and good riddance - I doubt that he'll go hungry.
Buzz Killington the third wrote: » Smell of begrudgery in here...
Bambi wrote: » Denis next, god willing.
Andy Dunne11 wrote: » I wonder has anyone checked lodgements in his wifes account(s) lately. Just saying
Judgement Day wrote: » It's hard to feel much sympathy for the man given the devastation that his shenanigans have caused to the many thousands of workers who lost their jobs down the years
Valetta wrote: » Where did the jobs come from in the first place?
seamus wrote: » Titles are not recognised in Ireland, so it's technically correct for the Irish media to omit them when referring to someone.
Tombo2001 wrote: Always came across as a decent guy to me, would take no pleasure in seeing him run into financial difficulty. .
Nodin wrote: » I seem to remember him asking journalists to refer to him as "Sir Anthony" on some occasion. It's a matter of concern that he wasn't investigated by a tribunal.http://www.indymedia.ie/attachments/mar2012/ahern_burke_oreilly_dossier_19982011.pdf
Tombo2001 wrote: » I quote from the article that you yourself just posted:"I am not suggesting that there was anything improperin anything Tony O'Reilly did or arranged to have doneon his behalf."
Tombo2001 wrote: » Which is the direct opposite of what you said; saying that he should have been the subject of a tribunal suggests that he did something wrong.
Mr.Micro wrote: » Mister is good enough. I would be happy for people to call me mister.:D
realies wrote: » Correct but when he was head of Independent media, he was Sir Anthony everything in that group of newspapers,it was cringeworthy .
Kermit.de.frog wrote: » I love the smell of begrudgery in the morning. (well, afternoon..)
Karl Stein wrote: » Lads how do you begrudge someone of massive debts? How does that work exactly?
Buzz Killington the third wrote: » Classic begrudgery right there because he had money in the first place.