rob316 wrote: » The difference is, Spurs sold there top asset in the hope they could build a squad to finish in the Top 4. We retained our best asset who got us into the Top 4. We have CL football to offer any target, while it doesn't give us the key to the best players in the world, we can go on a level from the players Spurs signed.
Fieldog wrote: » I don't think Barca would have him after this bite incident? Real Madrid? Maybe, but I don't think Barca can afford him either....
rarnes1 wrote: » The players Spurs signed were quality on paper. A few of them were certainly wanted by plenty of pool fans
rarnes1 wrote: » Perspective.http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/football/worldcup/luis-suarez-bite-lets-move-past-the-shock-value-and-get-some-perspective-9563690.html
redbaron_99 wrote: » Get the feeling that Liverpool might actually be relieved if Barcelona or Real come in with a bid that triggers a move. If a lucrative offer arrives in the next few weeks, I am convinced Suarez will be playing his football somewhere else next season
TimeToShine wrote: » Not a Liverpool fan but this is spot on. If we learned one thing from Spurs it's that you won't get away with selling your star players, full stop.
Agueroooo wrote: » WTF... Did you just copy and paste and make Carraghers words your own?
Agueroooo wrote: » Lamela
Turtyturd wrote: » Have some totally original thoughts on why AVB would be a good fit for us...might stick them up in a while.
rob316 wrote: » Rubbish article imo. I read the whole thing and the writer failed to acknowledge one simple fact its his 3rd time doing it, he hasn't learned. Comparing to one off worse incidents and rugby is just burying your head in the sand. If someone else with no previous bit someone it wouldn't be looked on as strongly, that is what the hysteria is about, the sheer disbelief that the idiot has done it for a 3rd time.
martingriff wrote: » When Torres, Fowler, Owen were at there best we were saying the same things but we moved on an got other players and we will again
x43r0 wrote: » Correct me if I'm wrong but I don't think any of those 3 were playing at the level Suarez currently is at the times they left the club so replacing them wasn't as big a task as replacing Luis would be
Knex. wrote: » Replacing Suarez would be akin to attempting to replace Gerrard in 05 if he had left. You can't replace, so you adapt.
What heinous crime could Luis Suarez have committed to prompt such a response from two players who were not exactly shrinking violets on the field? He bit someone.
Agueroooo wrote: » 31 PL goal 12 PL assists its going to take something else to adapt if/when we have to replace that.
martingriff wrote: » Suarez without doubt is one of our best players however last season we have showed others can step up Sturidge as an example. It was the Same with Gerrard we could not afford to be without him but last year when he was out we actually played good football and win without him. Is Suarez goes then we can adapt and get way to win. With the money we get from him we could back great player. Improve the defense then we do not have to score loads of goals per game just to win but for fun. When Torres, Fowler, Owen were at there best we were saying the same things but we moved on an got other players and we will again
SteM wrote: » This was not something done in the heat of the moment
SteM wrote: » Stopped reading here He didn't just bite someone - he bit someone after previously being found guilty of biting 2 other players. This was not something done in the heat of the moment, he knew what he was doing as he's done it twice before. People seem to want to pass this off as an isolated incident but it's not. Do we need some perspective? When former players like Mills and Shearer are calling for such major punishments then we probably do but lets not down play this as one person biting another person in a moment of spontaneity either.