scuba8 wrote: » Did they actually produce evidence that they had committed the bombing or did they just say that they did it. Did they make written statements confessing their guilt. That was what was required. They could have done that much. By the way who were the bombers?
realies wrote: » Mick Murray has been named as one of the IRA bombers [25] and was sentenced to 12 years at the same trial that convicted the Birmingham Six.[1] Patrick Hill, one of the Six, said in April 2012 that the Six had learned the names of the real bombers and claimed it was common knowledge among the upper echelons of both the IRA and the British government.[26] He says he was told in around 1980 that IRA members had admitted that five people carried out the bombings, and that two of the five have since died, and two have been promised immunity.[27] There is amble evidence on the internet if you want to find out more about what happened including the ground breaking documentary of who bombed Birmingham , Anyway this thread is not about who done what it's about a man who died and was wrongly convicted by so called brittish justice. RIP
scuba8 wrote: » Too little too late. At the time of the sentencing it would have been simple for the real bombers to go to a solicitor, make a writen statement,put stuff in the statement that only whoever planted the bomb could know. Go with the statement and a solicitor into a police station in Belfast and confess. Gerry Conlon would have to be released. Did they do that did they heck.
Tramps Like Us wrote: » Gerry Conlon spent a lot of time in recent years working on the case of the Craigavon Two, two men jailed for a murder they did not commit and were stitched up for You can read more about the case and campaign here:http://justiceforthecraigavontwo.com/ The best tribute you can make to Gerry is to continue his work against injustices like what he and now the craigavon two are suffering. Sadly the cases of the Guildford Four etc were not unique and similar things happen today
realies wrote: » In February 1977, during the trial of the Balcombe Street ASU, the four IRA men instructed their lawyers to "draw attention to the fact that four totally innocent people were serving massive sentences", referring to the Guildford Four.[5] Despite claims to the police that they were responsible[5] they were never charged with these offences, and the Guildford Four remained in prison for another twelve years. I am old enough to remember when there was active protests and campaigns to highlight the innocence of the Birmingham six,Guildford four and the maguire family and the complete silence and indifference of the majority of the Irish goverment and media was shamefull.
realies wrote: » In February 1977, during the trial of the Balcombe Street ASU, the four IRA men instructed their lawyers to "draw attention to the fact that four totally innocent people were serving massive sentences", referring to the Guildford Four.[5] Despite claims to the police that they were responsible[5] they were never charged with these offences, and the Guildford Four remained in prison for another twelve years. I am old enough to remember when there was active protests and campaigns to highlight the innocence of the Birmingham six,Guildford four and the maguire family, and the complete silence and indifference of the majority of the Irish goverment and media was shamefull.
LorMal wrote: » This is the same Balcombe Street gang who were cheered and lifted aloft, feted as heroes, at the Sinn Fein Ard Fheis on their release. Pathetic.
Busted Flat. wrote: » The war was over then.
Riddle101 wrote: » RIP Gerry Conlon, thankfully he didn't die in a prison cell.
LorMal wrote: » Yeah, that excuses everything...
Busted Flat. wrote: » There was a war going at the time, declared by William Whitlaw minster for NI.
Choochtown wrote: » One of the most sickening things about what happened to Gerry Conlon is that the British authorities knew that he was innocent but it was much easier to let him rot in prison and hope his supporters would eventually shut up. Unfortunately I don't think statements from the Balcombe Street bombers would have made any difference whatsoever. There were reputations to protect.
scuba8 wrote: » That has no relevance at all. The fact is the Ira had the means at their disposal to have Gerry Conlon released. They chose to do nothing and left him to rot in jail for 15 years. The British police were a disgrace and should themselves be in jail. But the Ira share a large portion of blame.
jca wrote: » That's a bit like going back to the bookie saying I meant to put the money on the other horse that won.
Busted Flat. wrote: » Read the posts, and look back at what was said. SF bashing has no place in this thread. There are several other threads will satisfy your requirements.
tomwaterford wrote: » what more could they do?? from Wikipedia: Along with other members of the Unit, he was eventually cornered by the Metropolitan Police in Balcombe Street and arrested after a week-long siege. He was eventually charged with sixty offences, and received twelve life sentences and a whole life tariff. O'Connell made a speech from the dock in which he said: We have recognised this court to the extent that we have instructed our lawyers to draw the attention of the court to the fact that four totally innocent people – Carole Richardson, Gerry Conlon, Paul Hill and Paddy Armstrong – are serving massive sentences for three bombings, two in Guildford and one in Woolwich, which three of us and another man now imprisoned, have admitted that we did./COLOR][/SIZE][SIZE=2][COLOR=#0066cc]4[/COLOR][/SIZE][SIZE=2][COLOR=#0066cc
scuba8 wrote: » Statements from the dock years later does not cut it. At the time Gerry Conlon was convicted they could have made written statements through a solicitor in which they put in details of the bombing that only those involved could know. Then go with their solicitor and their written statements to say a police station in Belfast. Notify the press of what they were doing and confess. The Brits would have had no option but to quash the convictions. They chose to let innocent men take the blame for the bombing.
Bambi wrote: » tbh you'd have spanners complaining that gerry kelly did'nt try bust the guildford 4 out of jail. Its almost pavlovian in some types at this stage, anything related to the troubles: blame the shinners