Acknowledgement and acceptance of your order Everything that DFS sells is handmade. As a manufacturer we pride ourselves on being able to make furniture that's perfect for you. If you place an order with dfs Direct, we will send all your paperwork by 1st class post to arrive within 3 working days. It is important that you appreciate and understand that this order is a legally binding contract.
howyegettinon1 wrote: » Thanks for the advice, very expensive lesson by the looks of things! Just a last shot in the dark, what about if I was able to prove I was intoxicated or the influence of drugs at the time of the purchase? Would that void the contract?
howyegettinon1 wrote: » Just a last shot in the dark, what about if I was able to prove I was intoxicated or the influence of drugs at the time of the purchase? Would that void the contract?
Individuals who are clearly intoxicated - by alcohol or otherwise - are generally deemed not to be able to enter legally binding agreements.[22] Lord Ellenborough stated that such persons have "no agreeing mind",[27] though similar principles apply as to those who are otherwise incapacitated. A drunken person can choose to ratify a contract once they are again sober,[28] and under the Sale of Goods Act 1979, they are legally bound with regard to contracts for necessaries.
Victor wrote: » (a) Do you want to admit in court that you are a nuisance drunk? or (b) Do you want to perjure your self and face a stiff prison sentence?
Bepolite wrote: » Contact FLAC, having said that Citizen's advice sound correct. I'm wondering if Unfair contract terms regs might come into play.
Goat the dote wrote: » That's absolutely ridiculous. You signed the contract, for a bespoke item, suck it up
ABajaninCork wrote: » You dodged a bullet with DFS! Bought a sofa from them once. Never again - cheap Chinese crap. Your rellie's sofa will probably last longer.
howyegettinon1 wrote: » Also if i was persued for the remaining amount through the courts, Im a right to believe they can only look for the production cost of the couch, without their profit margin?
godtabh wrote: » THings changehttp://www.theguardian.com/business/2013/jun/30/dfs-leads-british-manufacturing-resurgence
Fred Swanson wrote: » This post has been deleted.
dudara wrote: » I doubt it - they are entitled to look for loss of earnings or revenue. Otherwise, what's the point of business?
The Mustard wrote: » Damages in contract are generally calculated on what the person would have been entitled to, had the contract been performed.
Bepolite wrote: » True but they have a duty to mitigate their loss. In this case the loss would be zero.