Magaggie wrote: » I agree. Are you actually saying no such ads exist? (Btw, I wouldn't have a problem with them - the women choose to appear in the ads; the Diet Coke ad - does nothing for me, it's a mistake for people to think all women love that kind of stuff).
KKkitty wrote: » It's the gangs of women ogling the men in those ads that annoys me. If say an ad was made that showed a group of men purposely getting a woman's top wet and she stripped to her bra and said men were basically salivating over her there'd be uproar.
KKkitty wrote: » I'm female and find most ads to be condescending and patronising towards men. Any ad to do with babies always has the Mammy character to the fore of the commercial. That Donal ad tried to make men out to be complete idiots at diy. The diet coke ads with topless men is also degrading. If the role was reversed and a woman was shown in that way bleeding heart feminists would be up in arms.
KKkitty wrote: » The adage "sex sells" is becoming archaic I think. Nicole bloody Scherzinger can't seem to wash her hair or eat a flipping yoghurt without having an orgasm over it. Maybe that's why Lewis and her keep breaking up. Poor Lewis can't tell if she's faking it or not.
fleet_admiral wrote: » maybe he was upset at her winning the eurovision this year
Un Croissant wrote: » Women can't defecate without yogurt.
Hande hoche! wrote: » Poor Donal. My favourite ones involve the girlfriend who is amazed her cretinous partner has managed to prepare a meal without burning down the house.
Hande hoche! wrote: » I do find myself on occasion wishing that yer man from the Liberty insurance ad would meet a violent end.
St. Jimmy wrote: » Not so much patronising I don't think, but I just seen an ad about drink driving where some school kids are on a school trip in the park or wherever and a driver loses control and smashes into the bunch of children and rolls over them. It gets the point across in it's own eerie way. Drinking and driving = bad. Although, the end of the ad is an empty classroom with the words "Shame on you" on the screen as Sweet Child Of Mine" playing. They may as well have said "THIS IS YOUR FAULT!"
Lucifer MorningStar wrote: » Not patronising but I cannot stand that ****ing Mc Donalds ad that's been on a lot lately
whisky_galore wrote: » Hate ads that try to be funny and fail miserably, esp those with Irish comedians who hit a dry spell....you know who you are.
Deleted User wrote: » I've always liked this ad though most find it deeply offensive.
AnonoBoy wrote: » Can't see anything offensive about it at all......... nope. Why on earth do you like it?
Maximus Alexander wrote: » The one where the person eating honey makes a face like they've just be stabbed in the crotch? Drives me mad.
AnonoBoy wrote: » Who are you talking about? Spill the beans!!!! Although you do realise that the comedians don't write the ads, don't you?
St. Jimmy wrote: » Here's the ad. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MD8BkIgp9Fo
Zed Bank wrote: » Thing is though, isn't that just a rehash of an earlier ad? Remember the one with the lad playing football in the garden? Except now it's a classroom :rolleyes:
AnonoBoy wrote: » Ads have always been patronising. In retail the catchphrase is "the customer is always right." In advertising it seems to be "the customer is always a moron."
Deleted User wrote: » It's just the oddest, most deliberately offensive ads possible. It's an ad that set out to cause uproar and did so rather well.
PinkFly wrote: » That littlewoods advert for the school reunion does my head in with Caroline what's her face, argh!!