kylith wrote: » Who gives two sh!ts if she actually said the word dumped or not? I'm saying it. If there is one body in that septic tank it was dumped there. Hells, I'm inclined to say that even if they were buried in the ground on the plot the fact that they weren't given a proper funeral would equate with them being dumped in my eyes. They were discarded with, apparently, ne'er a thought from the nuns. If all you can do is quibble about whether or not she used a word rather than one of its synonyms then your entire argument is piss-poor.
I Heart Internet wrote: » No it's not. Whether 800 bodies, or 1, were dumped in a septic pit is very important to me. So important, in fact, that I'd actually like to know what happened.
I Heart Internet wrote: » Then why do you insist on saying they were dumped when even Catherine Corless, who has more information than anyone/most says explicetly that they were not dumped?
robindch wrote: » At this stage, IHI, it's beginning to look like you're here just to troll the conversation. You can consider this a formal moderator warning to take part in an adult discussion about the thread topic or else be carded or banned for off-topic, self-centered rambling which is annoying just about everybody.
I Heart Internet wrote: » I read the transcript earlier, and viewed the video. The transcript is a transcript of the video recording, not a transcript of Rosita Boland's full interview. unless you're suggesting that Rosita Boland wrote her article based on 3min 33s of speech from Catherine Corless. Are you suggesting, just so I'm clear, that Rosita Boland is lying when she attributes the following words to Catherine Corless? Are you saying Catherine Corless never said this? Or are you just saying that it's not part of the 3min 33s video clip?
Bannasidhe wrote: » Is there anyone in Galway who would be willing to visit the archives and access Galway Board of Health & Public Assistance, 1922 – 1941, (GC5/) includes minutes and abstracts of accounts and Home & Home Assistance Committee records. . It is restricted but still a goldmine. If anyone can please PM and I will tell you what to look for...
Tipsygypsy wrote: » When you say 'restricted'...? I'm in Galway and could put a few hours in if you pointed me in the right direction.
Bannasidhe wrote: » Until an excavation is conducted no one can say for sure. One would think if there they went to the trouble to have ceremony they could have made a wee note about where the bodies were now wouldn't one.Who wrote that by the way - you seem to have forgotten to provide a linky...
Bannasidhe wrote: » MODS - any chance of putting it in the charter that people who repeatedly post information that has been debunked time and time again in the same thread be infracted for time wasting and not bothering to read back even a few pages??
krankykitty wrote: » I'd help if I can do something in Dublin Bann...
Bannasidhe wrote: » .
Zubeneschamali wrote: » Yes, but they totally made that up. The only facts we know are: 1) 796 children died, and their burials were not registered anywhere 2) The old septic tank was reported by locals to be full of human skeletons, little ones. That's it for facts, so far.
Dodd wrote: » I think you were looking for this. The tank became defunct in 1938 when a new drainage scheme came to Tuam.http://connachttribune.ie/campaign-recognise-800-dead-tuam-babies/
lazybones32 wrote: » I just love being right
lazybones32 wrote: » "...totally made..up"? It's the Sunday Independent we're speaking of, not Weekly World News.
robindch wrote: » A team effort
iguana wrote: » I personally don't give a shít if each and every one of those children was given a full state funeral after they died and is now resting in a position of honour atop the hill of Tara. I care about the fact that they weren't loved, weren't cared for, were used and hurt and neglected until they died. Many of them should still be alive now. The younger ones should be driving their kids crazy because they give their grandkids ice-cream before they finish their dinner and the older ones should be knitting weird bloomer pants for their great-grandkids that unite the middle two generations in bafflement. They should be telling everyone they can corner about how much better summers were in their day and going on cruises to find some sunshine. They didn't get a chance to live the amazing, mundane, loved lives that they deserved and that's what is making people angry
Obliq wrote: » It's not off topic RoadHouseBlues. Folk have stuff to say, and there's many with some sorrow, even if it's about what they witnessed but didn't happen to them directly. It's about time we heard people's stories really...