Kaiser D wrote: » I dunno, it is bloody terrifying, but if you get the hang of it and just don't steer at all its pretty fun.
tossy wrote: » My next car will probably be diesel ans slow lol
toastedpickles wrote: » I need one of those
toastedpickles wrote: » Haha this is true, well I just proved it so! :pac:
tossy wrote: » Well they do say Diesel is the fuel of devil lol
toastedpickles wrote: » Nah it did sound like the depths of hell was coming out it it though
tossy wrote: » Did it COooooooo? A lot of the drivers seem to be putting straight through pipes on these, it's like the Jurassic park of Pigeons.
Kaiser D wrote: » My neighbors built this, I can confirm it is indeed the scariest thing I have ever driven. It is fupping mental.
Noccy_Mondy wrote: » Woah! Ususally it's piles of scrap that they have you learning in! Wouldn't be too confident driving that around one of the big cities for the first time :eek:
toastedpickles wrote: » Jaysus i've never been as nervous, this evening can't come quick enough in other news I was behind a v8 scania today, fair enough its a truck, but it made some noise
Kopparberg Strawberry and Lime wrote: » Well if ya's are that bored, I have a driving lesson later today in something a bit bigger than a car !
Noccy_Mondy wrote: » Some clod literally went around them 20 times with a silicone gun!! It's not taking them off that bothers me, it's the putting back that scares me And it looks like they are already cracked in a few spots.... could be opening a Pandoras box here!!
toastedpickles wrote: » Well he is from mayo...... :pac:
dgt wrote: » Man up and take those lenses off, what are ya a man or a camel :pac:
Noccy_Mondy wrote: » Ya ya excuses excuses. The front end of the 206 isn't looking too groovy. Took off the grille and headlights, but the feckers are so well sealed it's a task and a half to get the glass off. Might just leave it - they will be full of condensation before long if I don't reseal them properly..
Noccy_Mondy wrote: » Jaysus tis fierce dead around these parts. Ye're like a bunch of camels!
Deleted User wrote: » Can you actually get away with that, though? Surely every second Cruiser would be the same if that were the case? Is that true? :eek: If so, a (commercial) cruiser may well find it's way onto my radar (Edit: as an aside, i get low 20s in the Rav!)
Bpmull wrote: » They certainly wouldn't be any worse than a petrol rav4. I know a lot of people who have them landcruiser a and always get early 30 mpg which is as economical as an jeep it's size will be. The auto version would be a bit harder on diesel but that's the case with most thing.
toastedpickles wrote: » 2 litre engine on the book probably
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://w5.vanillicon.com/v2/56ba4282a2b804f3e600ff03b47f6925.svg)
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://w3.vanillicon.com/v2/3bf46be0cf79f0bb3512ceb2702cfaa0.svg)
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://w5.vanillicon.com/v2/5029bac657ae68f2ca4b7fa18994db0d.svg)