Ravenid wrote: » Finland: 5 dead babies found. Person arrested for manslaughter. Ireland: 800 dead found. Ahh sure we'll Say a mass and put up a plaque.
darkpagandeath wrote: » Wow just Wow the mental gymnastics going on here to defend an organisation with a history of child neglect/abuse which are facts that cannot be denied. 100 out of 800 is clearly a large percentage of deaths due to facts shown malnutrition. Any way you care to try spinning that it's glaringly obvious it's a large percentage. Would these defenders be so quick to the ramparts if this organisation was not RCC ? I mean would they defend 100 out of 800 people in a hospital dying of malnutrition or any other part of society so quickly.
RobertKK wrote: » It is not defensible. It is like that hospital in England where hundreds of patients died from sub standard care.http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/213177/Hospital-patients-left-to-drink-water-from-vases It doesn't mean everything about hospitals is bad...generalising all from one group as bad is just as wrong, and such generalisations can lead to bad things happening, as we saw with the Jews in WW2.
Ravenid wrote: » Finland: 5 dead babies found. Person arrested for manslaughter. http://www.rte.ie/news/2014/0604/621560-finland/ Ireland: 800 dead found. Ahh sure we'll think about doing something.http://www.rte.ie/news/2014/0604/621550-tuam-grave/
StudentDad wrote: » It's worse than that. There would appear to be an attitude of indifference on the part of authorities here, that goes beyond, 'ah sure we'll think about doing something.' Probably because if real questions were asked, they'd lead to real answers and god forbid here in rainy auld Ireland that we actually have real answers coupled with real responsibility and culpability. I've grown up in this country and year after year revelations about atrocity after atrocity come out. I've yet to see any real apology or prosecution. This to my mind is one of those subjects that will be punted so far into touch my great grandkids may be forced to deal with it. SD
RobertKK wrote: » The difference is big between them. Finland, known perpetrator and within the last 5 to 10 years. Tuam - 50 to 90 years ago, most of those responsible likely dead or not far from it.
Nodin wrote: » Nobody said all hospitals are bad. They are saying that its statistically shown that a great many church run mother and child homes were very bad indeed. Pathetic comparison btw.
RobertKK wrote: » Really? I was responding to I mean would they defend 100 out of 800 people in a hospital dying of malnutrition or any other part of society so quickly.Pe0ple in that hospital were drinking water from flower vases the care was so bad, with 1200 deaths above normal. I said it was all indefensible, but one wouldn't generalise all.
wildefalcon wrote: » Here now! Asking for some Religious to be investigated and subject to the rule of law is hardly the same thing as putting millions of people to death in a gas chamber!
What is common to Rwandans is bigger that what differentiates them. In Rwanda there is no Hutu language, there is no Hutu culture, in much the same way there is no Tutsis language, land or culture. The people of Rwanda are one people. All these differences are just what people manipulated and of course we the Rwandans were also guilty because we were naïve. They made us look as if we are different. Unfortunately generalisation causes problem.
darkpagandeath wrote: » The organisation is still with us and accountable.
josip wrote: » Never too old if they're still alive. Most people supported trying and sentencing Laszlo Csatary and Eric Priebke.
kylith wrote: » There's a link to a petition campaigning for a full investigation in my sig. Sign and pass it on.
RobertKK wrote: » How many are alive though? People have used Finland but do we know how many are alive from Tuam, that could be prosecuted and who actually was responsible?
Take Your Pants Off wrote: » I dont get this. Dead children are buried, whats wrong with that?
--LOS-- wrote: » Well......I'm feeling less homesick now With the greatest respect, what do you hope to achieve with this petition? What happens if/when it reaches 10,000 signatures. If anyone feels strongly enough about this, then I would urge them to write to government officials personally. It will have much much more of an effect than throwing your name on some petition, e-petitions really achieve very little if anything. A personal email/letter/face to face contact is much more powerful. So instead of being passive aggressive online, tell them yourselves instead of letting someone else speak for you.
eviltwin wrote: » Let's find out! Even if no one ever goes to prison over this at least there might be the possibility of answers as to what actually went on. It's surprising not one nun has ever come forward at any stage to disclose information. Just goes to show that the attitude to single mothers and their children is still there.
--LOS-- wrote: » If anyone feels strongly enough about this, then I would urge them to write to government officials personally. It will have much much more of an effect than throwing your name on some petition, e-petitions really achieve very little if anything. A personal email/letter/face to face contact is much more powerful. So instead of being passive aggressive online, tell them yourselves instead of letting someone else speak for you.
josip wrote: » True, I emailed the local TDs, Enda and the Minister for Justice on the 13th of March demanding heads over the whistleblowers. I'm sure others did also.
RobertKK wrote: » Those petitions achieve nothing, signed one in the past against F1 going to Bahrain because of the human rights issue when they were killing their own people, it got hundreds of thousands of signatures, the F1 race went on...
Ash.J.Williams wrote: » going on some comments here, am i right in thinking that when the church receives praise, it's for the WHOLE church, but when it receives criticism, they are parishes and homes that are totally independent and not accountable to bishops etc.....