Iwasfrozen wrote: » Translation: "Ourselves forever"http://sebastiansgames.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/Forever_Alone.png
davycc wrote: » Sinn Féin Abú!:D
frimpong wrote: » I disagree. People under 25 have grown up with little to no experience of the troubles. People under 18 have grown with no experience of the troubles whatsoever. Most young people now have no hang ups about Sinn Fein as they will have only ever known them as another political party. Sinn Feins support will only grow over the next ten years imo, particularly in the under 25 age group.
Jester252 wrote: » left-wing politics are political positions or activities that accept or support social equality FYI.
Weathercheck wrote: » Am I wrong or did Sinn Fein under achieve like usual? Polls before the election were suggesting they'd hit 21/22%. As usual their vote is soft and the reality was it was 15.2%. Hardly a ground breaking result in a mid-term election in the current climate. The real outcome from this election is the depressing renewal of Fianna Fail. It is incredible to think that it is likely they will lead the next government just one term on from bringing this country to ruin.
jank wrote: » Massive expansion of the state is usually regarded as left. They doubled the OAP and welfare in a matter of years never mind the bloated mess of the HSE they created. Social partnership and benchmarking, all created to keep the unions on their side. You honestly think unions would vote for a centre right party?
Agueroooo wrote: » that would be absolutely disgusting if it happens in the next G.E. has the pwople forgotten all ready what that shower done to our country, and youth for decades to come. and I wouldn't mind those stupid enough to vote them back in probably have kids over the other side of the world working cause of FF policies whilst in power. fúcking short memories is right.
Agueroooo wrote: » fúcking short memories is right.
Banjo String wrote: » I wouldn't oppose domestic rates down here either. Great value for money.
dxhound2005 wrote: » Better value for money for someone who pays €1000 than for someone who pays €4000. Why does the value of a house have to be taken into account when a charge for services is being levied? If they are neighbouring properties doesn't the cheaper one get the same services as the more expensive one?
K-9 wrote: » but FF will probably have 40-50 TD's.
Banjo String wrote: » I wouldn't oppose domestic rates down here either. Great value for money. Better value for money for someone who pays €1000 than for someone who pays €4000. Why does the value of a house have to be taken into account when a charge for services is being levied? If they are neighbouring properties doesn't the cheaper one get the same services as the more expensive one?
K-9 wrote: » The other thing about SF is it is easy for the establishment parties to put a halt to their rise in the opinion polls. SF were even ahead of FF in some opinion polls, but the Gerry Adams business gave a short, sharp shock to people considering them. I'd say they lost 4/5% of the vote they should have got from all that. So while SF did well in the election and definitely gained support from areas inconceivable 10 years ago, the establishment can very easily put a stop to their gallop. This strategy can only work so long, as the old guard gets replaced it will become less and less effective, but for the next 4 or 5 years it will still work, to the benefit of FF and FG.
Jester252 wrote: » Anyone claiming FF are left by any degree must have not lived in Ireland during the 00s
Bannasidhe wrote: » SF are fish - they want to change Ireland including the most radical change of all - to bring the Unionist Presbyterian into the fold of a United Ireland - that will really stir things up.
mickydoomsux wrote: » Myths busted? SF haven't done anything so far. There isn't anything to bust.
mickydoomsux wrote: » So you're saying they don't oppose them at all? Interesting.
mickydoomsux wrote: » Are SF actively opposing these charges in the North or are they using the "aw shucks, we're a minority member of the executive <snip>
Donkey Oaty wrote: » . refusal to constantly express solidarity with North Korea or Cuba.
mickydoomsux wrote: » So you're saying they don't oppose them at all?
Iwasfrozen wrote: » No doubt graciously paid for by the despised Brits.
mickydoomsux wrote: » Are SF actively opposing these charges in the North or are they using the "aw shucks, we're a minority member of the executive and it's a different situation up here anyway for ........ austerity reasons and stuff, so we're sorry.
mickydoomsux wrote: » KTHNXBYE xoxo".
Iwasfrozen wrote: » They oversee it. The poster was careful of their language. Oversee does not imply they have control.