maryishere wrote: » who was it, that said with a smirk on his face at on a platform at a rally - to much applause - that "they haven't gone away you know". I appreciate that was some years ago. But do leopards change spots? Ask Jean McConvilles children.
Smidge wrote: » I think the reason why people like you can't put it in the past and move forward is that you, for some bizarre reason, see it as a one sided event. Its like a form of masochism at this stage. Keeping an old wound open and poking and scratching at it and generally keeping the infection spreading.
William F wrote: » Sinn Fein will have a combined vote north and south larger than FG or FF at the end of these elections. Won't that make them the largest party in the country?
bumper234 wrote: » I must mark this post down for future reference for when the next "will you wear/buy a poppy" thread comes along
Barely There wrote: » FF have done quite well because a lot of disaffected FG and Lab voters would rather poke their eyes out with a rusty spoon than give the Shinners a vote - can't say I blame them. Bad and all as FF have been for the Country, letting SF near the levers of power of our state would make the last few years of recession look like the Teddy Bear's picnic.
LordSutch wrote: » The flip side refers to the two sides of the same coin, as in (SF/IRA) and the Alzheimers obviously refers to the fact that only a few years ago the public here were up in arms at the very thought of SF getting their hands on anything (other than guns and semtex). And now suddenly everybody seems to have forgotten the past & the deep connection between SF and the Provo's litany of death and destruction . . . . . I haven't forgotten.
tomwaterford wrote: » and I suppose it wouldn't be too much to ask for proof like??
tayto lover wrote: » Yesterday's vote was an eye opener for many particularly FG/Labour. They were arrogant and sneery, Hogan, Rabbitte, Noonan, Kenny and Howlin in particular. They ignored the vox pops, opinion polls and protest marches because they were arrogant. The people were not having that. Both parties suffered as a result and many seats were lost. Labour is now in turmoil and have a very rocky road ahead. The party of the workers turned their back on the workers and have suffered. I actually thought it would have been even worse for them. The chickens have come home to roost. No point blaming the parties that gained lads. The signs were there but were ignored .
Banjo String wrote: » Their will be a general election before they make it full term. Guaranteed.
Barely There wrote: » No, there won't. Guaranteed.
Barely There wrote: » We've seen what the Shinners will do when given the run of a stationary cupboard. Probably best we keep them away from anything more important eh?
Donkey Oaty wrote: » "WOLF TONER!" was the best headline on that story. I'm not sure if any of them used "A PAPIST NEVER REFUSED INK", but I'm sure it was on the shortlist if they didn't.
bumper234 wrote: » Short answer? No Long answer? Noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
andrewdeerpark wrote: » All the parties are not attaching Sinn Fein's weak point "the economy" and their policies on the economy that are not realistic; demand everything, pay for nothing, salt the supposed rich (over 100K) earners, give every lay about and bum top dole, benefits and a luxury healthcare system; how this is all going to be paid for after we give Europe the two fingers and burn all the bond holders (the source of money), bring back a worthless Punt. Oh yeah we will have to come running back to the olde enemy the British for the funds (really ironic) Their economics are a cross between Argentina and Zimbabwe, you think the country is bad now, elect sinn fein to power and let them loose then come back in 2 years... The hood winked the nation with the "time for change" slogan. I should say I have no issue with forgetting the historic IRA struggles we have to move on on that front. Its their reckless economic policies I have serious issues with...
tomwaterford wrote: » are you saying the dept of finance are incompetent???
tomwaterford wrote: » are there budget proposals not vetted and checked over the dept of finance...same as any other parties...indeed same as the govments as soon as the germans have seen it first?? are you saying the dept of finance are incompetent???
tomwaterford wrote: » ya...that was beyond disgrace....I wonder how the other parties didn't destroy him that time what are they fiddling out of the country that they half turned a blind eye to that...as politica;lly it is more damaging to SF than digging up jean mcconvilles name for enda Kenny to childishly get out of answering Gerry adams questions
Barely There wrote: » Wonder how many medical cards all that stationary would have paid for?