Fratton Fred wrote: » That's some pretty serious pressure there alright, I bet the Royal Navy and RAF are on full alert tonight.
Busted Flat. wrote: » They have transcripts and tapes, but no idea of the identities of the contributor's. They are coded and are held by the people who made the tapes.
My name is URL wrote: » The main difference is the time limit. 28 days as opposed to 4 makes it far easier for a judge to grant extra time to police who are requesting it.
The judge isn't deciding on whether or not the suspect has more to answer for.. they're deciding on whether or not police need more time only.
Happyman42 wrote: » 42 years and 49 hours and all they have managed is to drag ssomebody in on hearsay evidence...yeh, they are trying real hard!
keeponhurling wrote: » Even if (however unlikely) the PSNI got access to all the Boston tapes and were told who is who in them, would that stand up in court? Realistically nobody's going to be admitting to anything to the PSNI
TheLastMohican wrote: » The usual crap from an Englishman that understands how Irish people feel about outside interference. If he wants to hear about atrocities let him read the Falklands war and Mr Wendy Deng's adventures in the Middle East. Fratton Fred, did you really believe the whole ballyhoo about the WMD? Go on, admit it. And you slavishly followed the leader. Both Thatcher and Blair caused so many deaths between them. But the great British public still revere them. One of the reasons why Britain is now considered a joke here in Europe.
sabat wrote: » How much longer do you reckon it'll be before he "paints the walls brown?"
.jacksparrow. wrote: » Sigh, someone already tried to be "hilarious" like this earlier in the thread and failed.
sabat wrote: » Oh no someone thinks the holy hunger strikers were a bunch of scatalogical weirdos and not the blessed martyrs of Éire IRA apologists want us to think.
Tramps Like Us wrote: » Don't worry, they'll be playing softly softly with Gerry, they cant put a bag on his head and batter him around the place for 3 or 4 days like they did to him in what some posters here would call "the good old days" I wonder if they'll still think this is great craic if SF do what martin mcguinness said they would and "review" their support of the PSNI on the back of this blatant political policing by segments of the psni. If they do that then dup will probably pull out of stormont and the whole thing will collapse and the progress that has been made will be down the jacks and we'll be back to sh!tty direct rule, neglect and political and economic stagnation and god knows what else. Yeah, real funny
.jacksparrow. wrote: » A situation the British government and unionists would relish.
Fratton Fred wrote: » Why?
.jacksparrow. wrote: » Because Sinn Fein are the biggest threat to ending partition. Bring down Fein and power sharing and you take away this problem.
Fratton Fred wrote: » Martin McGuinness is effectively threatening to pull out of the peace process if this doesn't go Gerry's way. That, right there, is political policing.
Fratton Fred wrote: » Ok.......
.jacksparrow. wrote: » Because Sinn Fein are the biggest threat to ending partition.
wazky wrote: » No they are not, they are part of the establishment within Northern Ireland now, they have no real desire anymore to end partition. They have all but renounced all connections to Republicans and are just another "Left" party now.