nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

Child Item

Listening to Music from Gary Glitter/Lost Prophets Etc

Indie18

Just wondering what people think about this, was talking to a mate about it the other day and just asked does he think it's ok, to listen to music from someone like Gary Glitter, who has been convicted of the things he has? Not sure myself what to think of it.

Find more posts tagged with

Quick Links

Comments

[Deleted User]

there music is totally separate from there personal files

Stavro Mueller

Well, their music is rubbish so most people won't be bothering to listen

MortGoldman

Rock & roll part 2 is a great song.

Custardpi

I think that if the music is strong enough most people will separate the art from the artist. In the past a lot of musicians got a free pass with regard to under age sex, the best example being The Rolling Stones. Even now, with changed societal attitudes the fact that they made such strongly acclaimed songs & are basically regarded as rock royalty means that their past transgressions will probably continue to be overlooked. One hit wonders or "guilty pleasure" acts such as Glitter wouldn't be indulged to the same extent.

Irish Guitarist

I had the first two Lostprophets CDs. I hadn't listened to them in years but still liked a couple of their songs and probably would have listened to them at some point. A few months ago after reading a few articles about Ian Watkins I couldn't get the images of what he had done out of my head so I cut up the two CDs with a scissors and threw them in the bin.

Custardpi

What if they had been your favourite band, would you have reacted the same?

suicide_circus

Gary Glitter is standing on a beach when a woman approaches him. "Excuse me sir" she said "but you're in my son"

Stolen from best joke thread.

FouxDaFaFa

I think if you like someone's music, you should listen to it regardless of their personal morals and make your own decision about whether you want to buy their material and (albeit, in a minor way) support them.

That being said, most people who have done bad things don't have songs that take you back to their crimes all the time so it's easy to disassociate their work from their crimes.

I cannot listen to R Kelly, for example, because so much of his music is creepy as fcuk when you know his background.

SEPT 23 1989

Don't dare put the Stones in the same bracket as those two

bobbysands81

suicide_circus wrote: »

Gary Glitter is standing on a beach when a woman approaches him. "Excuse me sir" she said "but you're in my son"

Stolen from best joke thread.

You sure that was in the 'Best Joke Thread'?

suicide_circus

bobbysands81 wrote: »

You sure that was in the 'Best Joke Thread'?

Think so.

I find it to be extremely amusing.

Irish Guitarist

Custardpi wrote: »

I think that if the music is strong enough most people will separate the art from the artist. In the past a lot of musicians got a free pass with regard to under age sex, the best example being The Rolling Stones. Even now, with changed societal attitudes the fact that they made such strongly acclaimed songs & are basically regarded as rock royalty means that their past transgressions will probably continue to be overlooked. One hit wonders or "guilty pleasure" acts such as Glitter wouldn't be indulged to the same extent.

There's a big difference between having sex with a young teenager and molesting a baby though. While I think it's terrible to take advantage of thirteen or fourteen year old girls (like Jimmy Page from Led Zeppelin did for instance) I don't think anyone from an established big name band has done anything as horrible as Ian Watkins or Gary Glitter.

If a musician I really loved did something truly terrible I'm not sure how I'd react or if I'd be able to listen to their music again. I can look past a lot of things about musicians but what Ian Watkins did was too extreme to ignore.

o1s1n

Irish Guitarist wrote: »

There's a big difference between having sex with a young teenager and molesting a baby though. While I think it's terrible to take advantage of thirteen or fourteen year old girls (like Jimmy Page from Led Zeppelin did for instance) I don't think anyone from an established big name band has done anything as horrible as Ian Watkins or Gary Glitter.

If a musician I really loved did something truly terrible I'm not sure how I'd react or if I'd be able to listen to their music again. I can look past a lot of things about musicians but what Ian Watkins did was too extreme to ignore.

Plus you also need to factor in royalties. If you're buying Lost Prophets albums for example, you're basically giving money to a child abuser.

[Deleted User]

Judge the art not the artist. If we were to judge a work of art based on the actions of the artist then we'd find ourselves with very little art too enjoy.

Would people celebrate Clint Eastwood if more were aware of what a horrible human he is. A man who abused his other halved, created on them repeatedly and in the case of one set out and successfully destroyed her career.

Drakares

Deleted User wrote: »

there music is totally separate from there personal files

That hurt to read

o1s1n

Deleted User wrote: »

Judge the art not the artist. If we were to judge a work of art based on the actions of the artist then we'd find ourselves with very little art too enjoy.

I get what you're saying, but it does leave a bit of a bad taste when the offending artist is literally part of the art. In the case of The Lost Prophets, you're listening to a baby rapist sing songs to you.

eamonnq

Deleted User wrote: »

created on them repeatedly

The dirty creator!!

dd972

What ?, is he their new lead singer !!! WTF ! :eek:

Custardpi

What if someone released a cover version of a Lost Prophets song?

Dravokivich

Custardpi wrote: »

What if someone released a cover version of a Lost Prophets song?

Whoever was credited for writing the song would be due "publishing rights."

Stavro Mueller

I'd not like to buy any of their music, play it on Spotify etc. Anything in fact that would lead to them earning money from their music. That might or not also include cover versions.

suicide_circus

No one ever brings up The Who in these conversations because their music is legendary. Pete Townshend is a nonce.
2pac was a rapist. John Lennon and Bob Marley effectively abandonded their children.

Custardpi

Dravokivich wrote: »

Whoever was credited for writing the song would be due "publishing rights."

But what about the reaction to hearing it on the radio, given that it wouldn't be "a baby rapist singing to you"? Would people still be turned off knowing the original author of the song?

cloudatlas

I enjoyed reading Ender's Game by Orson Scott Card who is an out and out vile homophobe.

Did I enjoy it as a work of art? Yes. Do I feel guilty? No because I didn't pay for it.

Don't assume that someone thinks a certain way because they read a certain publication.

Custardpi

suicide_circus wrote: »

No one ever brings up The Who in these conversations because their music is legendary. Pete Townshend is a nonce.
2pac was a rapist. John Lennon and Bob Marley effectively abandonded their children.

In fairness, wrt Townshend it does appear to be a bit more complicated than that.

Alias G

suicide_circus wrote: »

No one ever brings up The Who in these conversations because their music is legendary. Pete Townshend is a nonce.
2pac was a rapist. John Lennon and Bob Marley effectively abandonded their children.

That's not true. Townsend was on those sites for "research purposes".

Dravokivich

Custardpi wrote: »

But what about the reaction to hearing it on the radio, given that it wouldn't be "a baby rapist singing to you"? Would people still be turned off knowing the original author of the song?

I wouldn't know unless it was expressly stated. However I don't think it's much of a concern, bands of their type, rarely get others producing and releasing covers of stuff they've done. Covers tended to be a nostalgia thing for Nu-Metal. There's nothing defining about Lost Prophets that'd be considered nostalgic.

December2012

I can't enjoy Michael Jackson songs now because of the allegations about him.

Stavro Mueller

suicide_circus wrote: »

No one ever brings up The Who in these conversations because their music is legendary. Pete Townshend is a nonce.
2pac was a rapist. John Lennon and Bob Marley effectively abandonded their children.

If you started judging the characters of every musician out there, we'd be listening to feck all. I don't think most people will care what sort of parent someone is, what they were like as a person or what happened between consenting adults. It's a whole different ball game when you're talking about rape or paedophilia IMHO. That tends to make people think a bit differently.

Fratton Fred

One of the best concerts I've been to was Gary Glitter at the docklands arena. He was amazing.

I wouldn't give him the cheese off my knob now.