K-9 wrote: » I thought it was a brain freeze, but nope, you've actually thought that idiotic post through and blame the son. I'm sure the local IRA will totally understand and actually drive him to the station to help the police and tell him he'll be fine.
My name is URL wrote: » What's idiotic about it? He 'knows' who killed her. He's happy enough to come out and tell the world that he knows who killed her, but he refuses to tell police what he knows regarding an active murder investigation. Surely his silence is standing in the way of justice? Just because he's her son doesn't mean that isn't true.
K-9 wrote: » WTF, by Jaysus I've seen some idiotic posts in my time.......................
K-9 wrote: » Well the next step is moving on from the past as best people can, people did it already with the prisoner amnesty. The other way involves investigating 100's if not thousands of cases on all sides, or go the truth and reconciliation route.
bumper234 wrote: » I dare say he has told the police who did it, in fact i recon lots of people have told the police who did it but unless one of those people is willing to stand up in court and declare what they know then the police can't do jack **** about it. Would you be willing to stand up in court and say you saw these people kidnap/murder a woman? Would you risk your own life and the lives of your family?
Stheno wrote: » And that made it fine to leave ten children orphans, and waiting many many years to bury their mother?
Bambi wrote: » is this guy basically saying that he and his siblings know who did it but they arent telling? some family of geniuses if thats the case
iForgetMyPW wrote: » Oh boo whoo she knew what she was doing
rockbeast wrote: » And in the end Mandela was saluted off to his heaven as a Freedom Fighter... Some hypocrites on here - I'm off back to hang out in the rugby forums.
iForgetMyPW wrote: » I haven't been following this case but even if he was involved in murders during the troubles how can he go to jail when British soldiers killed innocent civilians too and noting happened to them. Am I missing something? To be honest this will only make things worse, just leave the past in the past ffs it was a war!!
Santa Cruz wrote: » "destabilising the peace process" i.e Shinner talk for "if we don't get what we want w e will let the boys loose again"
Red Pepper wrote: » muppet
iForgetMyPW wrote: » I know for sure that I would not be a informer during the troubles. Yeah it's sad for her children but what do you think they should of done? She was already warned, may I ask do you care about the men that the IRA murdered?
William F wrote: » The Brits are just covering their asses in case Scotland exists the Union and all the war crimes they were involved in eventually come out. So they've developed a strike first mentality and are trying to rid Sinn Fein of Adams and damage as much of the party as they can to mitigate the effects if it does happen. It's very risky but it's the only option they have for protecting war criminals and murderers whoes safety Teresa Valliers has guaranteed in yesterdays decision not pursue those responsible for Ballymurphy. It's only in the public interest to have Gerry Adams behind bars-the British public interest that is.
mrsbyrne wrote: » I'm speechless. Why don't you ring the PSNI and report the man for withholding information about a crime? Hopefully you'll get arrested for wasting police time. Idiotic post.
vitani wrote: » Oh, FFS. There's no proof she was an informer. And even if she was, it doesn't justify ripping her from the arms of her crying children, torturing her, killing her and then hiding the body. Before kidnapping her eleven year old son and beating him for hours so that he'll keep his mouth shut.
iForgetMyPW wrote: » Look I'm not saying it was right but those were dark times in our history. What about all the innocent people killed by the British. Not happens to those soldiers.... Move on ffs
Barely There wrote: » C'mon everybody do the Shinnerbot with me. 1) It was a war, **** happens. 2) The Brits did bad stuff too 3) Ah shur we all have a murky past don't we? Homophobic insult optional.
Iwasfrozen wrote: » What about them? If you're pulled over by the guards for speeding do you ask them what about all the other people speeding?
Barely There wrote: » Homophobic insult optional.
iForgetMyPW wrote: » What is that supposed to mean? Pretty much the British prime minster said a few years ago "Yeah it was bad that innocent civilians got killed by British soldiers during the troubles but sh*t happens we are very sorry." I don't see them going to jail, why can't we just move on
rockatansky wrote: » Whats that all about??
Iwasfrozen wrote: » Whether British officers have or have not done anything wrong is irrelevant to this case. You don't get away with murder just because someone else has gotten away with murder.
