thinkstoomuch1 wrote: » Nothing to do with characther players or heart etc Lost cleary by 15 picked and subs used Management awful errors.[/QUOTE Cannot agree with this statement at all. No surprise that this team and some members of it were absent against mayo and now against Dublin - 2 physical teams who are well able to squeeze. Cork have a lot of nice footballers and it is up to management with them to get them to ****ing toughen up for this level. Cuthbert needs to show his metal, put it up to walsh and either drop him or stop the dual bull**** at this stage
thinkstoomuch1 wrote: » Nothing to do with characther players or heart etc Lost cleary by 15 picked and subs used Management awful errors.
thinkstoomuch1 wrote: » It wouldnt cause ,Canty and kissane,arent akin to fast kicking ball movement. Kissane too lateral,slow on the ball and like rubgy league runs in to contact and doesnt have spatial awarness.An athlete,not a pure footballer. Canty would do at 3 alright,but thats not a problem for cork . Noel would be fine ,only one at half back. Alan o connor ,wouldnt have the pace ,and Nicholas,great servant,however kerry had hes number. Pearse would be ,i agree in hes day great there . I certainly wouldnt want carey ,2010 form at corner back. There is nothing wrong with our 1-7 once we get the balance right and let young lads grow.I cant believe the dismay and negativity re our players ,when talent is there,but wrong team was pickem. People got carried away with all ireland talk,and now were getting a view were worse than we are. Today was always on the cards. Managements naivety and a real lack of Even one expierenced ,proven track record man in there is clearly coming to the fore. Thats why I advocated Gene o driscoll should been a selector.Ciaran,davis ,etc no expierence. Ciaran though may be okay . Compare our management to Tyryone,Dublin ,Mayo and kerry . Were miles of in expierence. When cuthbert got the job,i said it,key was the selectors. Sean hayes,got the job ,brought in Gene at u21.People must realise against Harte,gavin and horan ,our management have been outthought. Forget bout kerry,they didnt want to know in the 2nd half.Thats wasnt the Real kerry. What they have is a proven management in Munster at least .
thinkstoomuch1 wrote: » He had nothing to aim that.I judge him when he has a real midfield to aim at . Gary,i have constantly,despite people refusing to say it,said we had a sub standard midfield,every game since feburary.Iknew this day was coming,and said in my preview we would only win ,if we acted fast at midfield.I can see it,many others can,so A Cork manager should see it.Simple ,its there job ,at the end of the day . I have to dissagree.How are management Learning ,when it takes 8 games show midfield is in dire straits yet Andrew starts all bar one,and half backs are played as corner backs. How long do want to give management to learn.This is a simple game .Everyone see we have huge problems at midfield,you say management are learning. Were in April,championship is upon us.Yes they are new,no excuse for Repeated mistkes being made over and over again.This talk that we will rectify ,.it in july is like counihan reigme,based n a hope than a belief. Hes team is set in stone ,12 lads I say . Andrew is one of them .If he starts in may ,is Cuthbert still learning. Today isnt being taken out of context.It shows serious flaws tacticajtlly and in the team that are 100per cent fixable,but you Cant fix it,you dont accept there is a problem.
thinkstoomuch1 wrote: » Id agree with that moral of the post archer,he is playing a game that is new ,and I dont blame of fault him for that ,i applaud him. That isnt the problem or the game plan.My point is,he is totally loyal to Andrew ,and fails to recoginse the midfield issue,and also playing a half back in the corner. That has zero to do with changing game plan ,or taking time,its a basic requirment that managememt team should say ,Clancy has had 4 games at corner back and been in trouble and midfield we have issues . To a point we are heading in the right path,but were at a crossroads now.If they dont sort midfield,dualism and corner back we will remain at cross roads at best,at worse go backwards and wont go forward.
keep going wrote: » Do ye know what would make agreat team the front half of this team with the back half of conors team
slingerz wrote: » I would have taken DOC off I thought he slowed down the attacks something fierce. Clancy looked to struggle at corner back and I don't think that position suits him Aidan Walsh was very poor though and I wouldn't overly judge the subs or team picked really I reckon they have to go by how training is going and how the players are. I reckon there is a lot of positives to take into championship for cork
Gary Neville wrote: » I don't agree with you about this being down to management Thinkstoomuch. There wasn't much they could do about MF IMO. The U21's are not being used so they can't consider Maguire or Kiely yet. AW has been injured. Dineen has only just joined the panel - we don't know why he didn't join earlier. Ruairi Deane looked like he would challenge but got injured. Management also hoped to have AOC available as maybe an impact sub. We did very well against a highly rated Kerry midfield and Butcher has been playing fairly well. Colm O Driscoll won a lot of breaks in Tralee and he was a loss. Ken O Hallorans kick-outs were woeful and this compounded the problem - maybe management should have been aware of this weakness as he was poor in Killarney last year but it hasn't been an obvious problem up to now. I agree that Michael O Laoire should have been given game time - I don't know why he wasn't used in the league. Apart from trying O Laoire, I'm not sure what else management could have done. We must also recognise that we had 3 defenders just back from long term injuries who were starting their 2nd games - this rustiness was a factor in Jamie giving the ball away that led to Dublin's goal - this was very unlucky too as the ball rebounded to McCauley when there was loads of Cork defenders nearby - it fell perfectly for him. When we have Cadogan, Dorman, BOD and Crowley all available then we'll have more options. Tom Clancy needs to be placed at 6 and see how he gets on. We are in the middle of team rebuilding and someone said that's like rewiring your house with the electricity still connected - you are bound to get a few shocks. I'd agree that Gene O Driscoll would have been a huge assett as Ciaran, Don and Owen are novices at this level but I'd say they are quick learners.