Jimmy Bottles wrote: » The volume of cash being wasted on cycle lanes, which inevitably take away filter lanes for cars causing traffic mayhem in the city centre. Why when all this work is being undertaken, why pot holes cannot be filled. Why every roundabout in the city is being dug up and replaced by lights.
STEINBERG wrote: » What would you suggest the cyclists do then?
Roger Hassenforder wrote: » f**k ya, coz, like cars are the only traffic with a right to use a road.
Flesh Gorden wrote: » Vanity projects with the use of the few in favor of the majority are a complete waste of money. They might as well be painted with gold leaf to make them glitter while reminding the majority of road users what a waste of money they are. Won't take long before the surface starts to disintegrate like the road out tto Mahon Point.
Roger Hassenforder wrote: » maybe if there was decent cycling infrastructure people might stop being traffic?
Deleted User wrote: » Housing waiting lists are ridiculously long. There are many vacant properties that could be used. New houses could be built, giving much needed employment to the construction sector.
hoodwinked wrote: » so we agree the current cycling infrastructure being put in IS a waste of money as it's not decent enough to be used? because as it stands i still see cyclists on the road cycling alongside the empty cycle lanes the money is being wasted on.
Roger Hassenforder wrote: » usually, the cycling lanes are rubbish; full of glass and chips that puncture. Surface, like the roads usually crap, and add some street furniture, gullies, parked cars, undished kerbs, you'd sooner take your chances on the roads. (note most bike lanes are not compulsory!). A lick of paint does not a cycle lane make. I'm reserving judgement on this one though, it looks different! separated from traffic, the raised kerbs will help stop glass/chips being blown in. maybe its another waste of cash, but if it encourages cycling, im all for it.
hoodwinked wrote: » that is one of many, they are still wasting money on putting in those roadside cycling lanes with that awful red stuff you'd also see at bus stops, why don't cyclists join motorists in complaining they are a waste of money and put a stop to them? around the city is one thing, and having separate cycle lanes is probably a good thing (i say probably as if you saw top gear last week you'll see how bus passengers or people crossing the cycle path then become the problem) but still around the suburbs roads are being narrowed to make way for cycle lanes, which then pushes motorists and cyclists closer together on the narrow road, because the cyclist won't use them and the motorist can't use them.
Roger Hassenforder wrote: » the attitude that cars have primacy needs to change.
hoodwinked wrote: » its not that cars have primacy though, i can only speak for myself, but my attitude personally is its down to speed, they gave pedestrians footpaths because they were slower than cars so it was safer for them to be on a side path out of the way, the same should apply to bikes
gimmick wrote: » Why is fibre broadband not in my area yet despite there being 4 cabinets within 250ms of my house. Why is the parking issue in my estate not fixed yet.
V.W.L 11 wrote: » I have similar issues,plus when it comes to social housing they claim to have no money for them yet they can afford to lease their vehicles for €875,000 per year,pay the maintenance staff their wages yet little work is done,and the cllr's want our vote???if my local area FF cllr gets back in he is the next lord mayor for that party,all smiles for the camera and the bank balance that goes with it,try living in the real world!!!!! RANT OVER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!