Ellenk456 wrote: » I'm doing the Leaving cert and to be honest I haven't worked as hard as I should've at all. There's only a month left to the mocks and I'm so unbelievably unprepared and have done close to nothing for them. Im fairly smart and do good when I actually study for tests, but I'm just so lazy and have no motivation. Is it too late to try and aim for 500 points at this stage of the year?
Ellenk456 wrote: » Thanks everyone Do you think I should write out notes and stuff then look at exam papers or just concentrate on doing exam papers and learning the answers off without writing any notes?
Legs.Eleven wrote: » Was completely overwhelmed at the time, so gave up.
Dj Stiggie wrote: » If you want 500 points then if you get over 400 or so in the mocks, its realistic with work. If you get less than 370, have another look at the CAO.
Dj Stiggie wrote: » Do some exam papers between now and the mocks. Then use your results as a guide to how much you think you can improve. If you want 500 points then if you get over 400 or so in the mocks, its realistic with work. If you get less than 370, have another look at the CAO.
Ellenk456 wrote: »
B.A._Baracus wrote: » I know a few people who failed their leaving cert and some who didnt even do it. Didnt stop them from going to college and this is a few years ago when the mature student age was 23. Now its 21 I do believe. Obviously, since recession some 18yo would be best off going to college immediately after school. As you are unlikely to get a job for a year or two with todays market. So waiting those 3 years until you are 21 would be wasted years. But who cares. Still a VERY young man at 21.
Capt'n Midnight wrote: » http://asset-5.soup.io/asset/6509/2549_5f39.jpeg
SamAK wrote: » Teachers have this way of making you think that all is lost if you feck up the L.C... I'm very uncomfortable with the whole situation. I didn't know my arse from my elbow when I sat the exams in 2009. I certainly had absolutely no fecking idea what I was interested in after college. If you do, then good for you, all i'm saying is that it's scary as hell seeing 17/18 year old kids just going for any old college course just because that's whats expected of them. Most of the time, parents don't care if it's your calling, they just want you to do SOMETHING. Like I said, if you know what you're passionate about, then good for you. But, it took me three years of bumming around and experiencing the world before I stumbled across something that really got my attention, that really made me thing 'god, I love this'.. So, I actually LIVED for a couple of years after secondary school, and I learned some things that school can never teach you. I found something that i'm really, really sure I want to dedicate my life to, and if I had aimed for going straight from S.C to college, I would have picked any old thing, even if I wasn't into it. And i'd have regretted it, or dropped out of the course. I'm nearly finished my second year of a PLC course, have applied through CAO for the course I WANT in an I.T, and I think i've got a good chance of getting it. Funny thing is, my chosen field (music tech/media production) didn't exist as far as my secondary school was concerned. Nothing music related on the cirriculum whatsoever. School is a system, and sometimes it fails to provide adequate opportunity and to cater for an individuals strengths. That's what I learned anyway.(Long winded post and not at all intended to convince you of anything, but it's food for thought and I wish someone had told me when I finished S.C that there's a whole world out there that we know feck all about)
Queen-Mise wrote: » Break it down OP - from what I remember of the Leaving Cert, for example, in Maths, you had to do four questions in each paper. Pick out the ones you are best at - and then work at them only. Do the same for the other subjects. So 8 or 9 exams by 4 questions in each is 32-36 questions to prepare. Break it down, you have loads of time.
urabell wrote: » IT, PLC, 'music tech' that's super nice that you found something that suits you but it'd be better if you didn't imply they were somehow superior choices because you had no aptitude for academics