hucklebuck wrote: » I really don't understand all this Jezki bluster, he is a fair way off the other market principles to my mind.
byronbay2 wrote: » I don't think you can draw too many conclusions from today's race except that HF is as good as ever - speed and stamina to burn on soft ground at Leopardstown. I think he is a more-than-fair price at 3/1 and must have a great chance of winning his 3rd CH in March. I haven't backed him and probably wouldn't until the day at this stage - always great offers on Champion Hurdle day! My thoughts have crystallised to the extent that I don't think anything outside the top 5 or 6 can win and I don't fancy Jezki or UDS. This leaves the Big 4 and if AP was to not run I would be very happy to dutch HF and TNO at about 5/4. Our Conor would be the only danger in that scenario (don't fancy MTOY to win this year) and I think he still needs to improve a bit - one for next year!
chinguetti wrote: » So Mullins has 3 chances in the race but how will he please 3 different owners who may all want to run in the race? Can't see Ruby getting off the Fly so both trainer and jockey will want to keep all horses apart. If Quevaga wasn't in the Mares race (has anyone heard anything about her yet?), AP would run in that race and he'ld aim UDS to another race at the festival. As they would probably be roaring favourites to win their races, he would have 3 happy owners come March 11th. He may end up with 3 owners who demand to run in the CH so how he'll handle this will be really interesting.
ste2010 wrote: » I reckon the new ones form may not be as good as people think. My angle for this was due to what i heard about ...I believe McCoy mentioned he will more than likely ride jezki in the CH...that's enough for me
tipster wrote: » jezki has no right to even go to cheltenham badly found out today
CheltenhamJ wrote: » I think this is way off the mark, still believe it has a place chance ( better ground , poor tactics today etc )
hucklebuck wrote: » He had one really good run and people still cream themselves about him, it's possible he was just a very forward 4 year old.
CheltenhamJ wrote: » Possible but more than one good run , poor ride in supreme