Bond investors were told last that the launch of the service was imminent, and it would have an attractive "user interface" and recording facility. The television service is currently being trialled with 400 customers.
choakem wrote: » Questions from those that have this service.. I am currently an efibre customer and I am considering switching from Sky to this new service... Can I stream a channel to my tablet or apple device whilst watching a different channel on my TV? I spend weekends at my partners house. Can I take this box with me and watch it? She has 20 Mb download but its not Efibre.... Will this work? thanks for any input...
burke027 wrote: » Hi I've ruled out the home plugs by hard wiring it to the router still the exact same. One final thing is my speed test is only showing about 39meg down is this about the average speed or should I be getting more
burke027 wrote: » my speed test is only showing about 39meg down is this about the average speed or should I be getting more
burke027 wrote: » So he got the stuff and brought in the home plugs the router was plugged into the power socket at phone line. He then tyres to plug in the home plug and it wouldn't fit as basically the phone socket was in the way. So he used a extension lead and left everything in the corner of the hall on the floor it looked like a big pill of junk to be honest a disgrace.
bk wrote: » I really don't have a lack of respect for other peoples choices ... a few less people end up getting suckered into eVision
BionicRasher wrote: » Here is another deal for you to mull over https://www.eircom.net/mobilebundles/productdetails?b=1 add in evision and it comes to a nice round €70 per month. For someone currently paying as example €40 to Vodafone for Broadband/home phone €27 or 28 to Sky for TV (not Sky+ may I add) and the bones of €15 to 20 for mobile phone this nice little package will save you a minimum of €12 per month. Perfect for a light user with minimum (if any) financial upfront layout
BionicRasher wrote: » I dont know why I am defending a product that I don't even have or will more than likely never get as its not currently suitable to my needs but it is pretty annoying when some people have an obvious lack of respect for other peoples choices and situations. Again I fully understand this is not going to suit everyone but please don't shoot it down at every opportunity as it really is a good option for some people.
bk wrote: » Actually as of 2011 only 64% of Irish homes had a fixed phone. One of the lowest rates in Europe. By now I expect it is even lower.
bk wrote: » As for your second point, but who doesn't have a mobile already and who isn't already spending €10 to €20 per month on it? So really it is just thinking about the overall who of both wired, wireless and TV services to get the best deal.
bk wrote: » Yup, no Irish channels, but usually not a big deal for a second room. You can always use Saorview with rabbit ears if the Irish channels are a big deal. ..... Cable is cheap.
bk wrote: » No, Freesat doesn't require a new LNB, you said they already had Sky+. Sky+ always comes with a quad LNB, so you can add either two multirooms or one extra Sky+/Freesat+ box, without replacing the LNB.
BionicRasher wrote: » I know a lot of people that continue to have landlines for the very purpose of calling each other in the evenings etc - different folks different strokes. I would imagine the younger population is veering toward moblie but there is a hugh chunk that have a landline
BionicRasher wrote: » Nice find can you post a link? Again this is €15 extra on top of the other stuff so its becoming more expensive again for a lot of people.
BionicRasher wrote: » Same as any other fibre provider bar UPC
BionicRasher wrote: » They would like to be able to record I would imagine
BionicRasher wrote: » No Irish channels? and TBH not every family can afford to shell out €220 for a freesat box and also they would need a new LNB, a Saorview box and antenna all the cables etc etc when they could get it for €10 a month extra on their current bill. After 18 months they will have paid €120 for the TV portion at that stage if they dont find its suitable give it back and have a look at the other options available.
bk wrote: » However I don't think it would matter to many if not most people. I know a lot of people who don't even have a landline phone plugged in any more.
bk wrote: » With Tesco Mobile offering unlimited calls to mobiles and landlines, texts and 1GB of data for just €15, many people don't want to pay for a landline.
bk wrote: » Also Eircoms speed is dependent on distance, it can go as low as 18mb/s if you are far from the cab
bk wrote: » Well if you aren't interested in the Irish channels, then Freesat with a Freesat+ is just as easy to use as a Sky box, with recording and series link included. There literally is no difference....... .... I readily admit that if you want the Irish channels, it isn't as easy as a Sky/UPC or eVision setup, .......
bk wrote: » First of all I would question, do they really need recording abaility in the second room, the Sky box in the main room can do that.
bk wrote: » They could run two more cables from the Sky dish to the second room and install a Freesat box there. They could either run the cables themselves, really easy job, or pay an installer to do it. A Freesat box is €100 and a Freesat+ box is €220.
BionicRasher wrote: » The Vodafone package you outline has no phone charges where as the Eircom bundle includes Off Peak calls and 30 mins to mobile
BionicRasher wrote: » The best UPC bundle I can see is also €60 and that’s for 50mbps down and 5mbps up and off peak phone so very similar to eVision (I realize more channels on UPC but remember in my case as an example I cannot get UPC broadband)
BionicRasher wrote: » You must remember people are used to Sky and UPC and all the nice and easy layouts, recording facilities etc etc. many people will not (even though it may be the best and cheapest in the long run) install a Freesat box a Saorview box, have 2 remotes and go through the hassle of trying to figure it all out. Its fine for the more tech minded to be downloading stuff and streaming it to TVs around the house but for Joe Bloggs that wants to watch Ear to the Ground on RTE and record the Eastenders via series link on BBC then a straight forward Sky+ style box is the way to go and what people are used to so eVision falls in to that category
BionicRasher wrote: » Peoples will see the eVision advertising TV for €10 and although there wont be a queue out the door to get it I believe there will be a decent take up. If people see a potential hassle free bargain then they will take it – especially as they will view it as €18 cheaper than a Sky basic TV (don’t jump down my neck as I know that’s not the true cost but that’s how peoples minds work)
BionicRasher wrote: » Take an example I am aware of – the house has Sky installed and in the main TV room where its used mainly by the man of the house for Sky sports etc etc. House has Eircom eFibre already and they want another TV to be able to watch / record things like Fair City/kids TV etc. and not to have to sit and watch golf and rugby all day. They currently have a feed going to the 2nd TV with a magic eye so can only watch whats on the main box The options are to get Sky to install multiroom at €15 per month extra or to get the eVision box installed – again the eVision box has advantages in that there is the recordable function and it also has the ability to be moved to another room that the family are doing up for the kids at the moment. They currently pay €50 a month for eFibre (yes it is expensive!) and for the extra €10 they get the eVision box. Sky has its advantages of course but its swings and roundabouts as with everything
frankz wrote: » Thanks guys for the clarification. Ya exactly evision seems good if it suits the household. Our house for example used to having sky in 3 different rooms so evision wouldn't work Just to be clear what I am talking about is not free multiroom - if you want multiroom you pay extra to sky or what ever provider. What I have is "mirror" channels in the other room - dont see how sky are not keen on this as their box provides for the option. Maybe I misinterpreting but anything sky aren't keen on they simply dont allow. IE They massive organisation and as a customer you can either do something or you can. (not like friends where frowned upon rather against the rules!! :-) :-) ) Maybe my post wasnt clear and it suggested that I was trying to get something that I shouldn't from sky - this is not the case I am just using a feature of the sky service and if I was to get tv service from a different provider I was just checking would I be able to get a similar set up. (hope that clarifies why it might be a drawback for some people)
Onthe3rdDay wrote: » no radio services.
Onthe3rdDay wrote: » The 7 day EPG and the recording facility are useful. But if you've a dish already up you'd be better off getting a freesat box with a HDD from the UK. You save 300 euro approx if the box lasted 5 year.
bk wrote: » But here is the thing, you have to pay for the overly expensive Eircom eFibre service in the first place. It is €60 for eFibre + eVision. By comparison, Vodafone 70mb DSL is just €35 per month, so really you are paying an extra €25 a month to get a poor line up of TV channels. A UPC Broadband + TV bundle at €60 or Vodafone 70mb BB + Sky Essential Bundle at €63 or Vodafone 70mb BB + Freesat/FTA/Saorview * at €35 all offer far better value for money IMO. * Obviously there is a once off up front cost for Freesat/FTA/Saorview that depends on what you currently have, but will easily pay itself back within 1 to 12 months. Really the only people who can benefit from eVision are those living in apartments that can't get UPC and can't put up a satellite dish. Really that is an incredibly small number of people. I love seeing more competition in the TV and Broadband market, but so far eVision is a very poor entry.
Onthe3rdDay wrote: » Where I was (Letterkenny) the house could also get Freeview lite from across the border. Switching between the eircom picture and the Aerial was like chalk and cheese. The only HD services off the Aerial were RTE1 and 2, but comparing the old RTE1 SD picture which is still on air with the eircom picture made the RTE1 SD picture look good.
Onthe3rdDay wrote: » Cheeky stuff like charging extra for CNN when it's free elsewhere isn't going to win it friends either.
Sully wrote: » €10 isn't overpriced IMO.
tui0hcg wrote: » My personal opinion is that it's good value for a basic service and not a bad product at all . It would work out 7 euro cheaper a month than what I would pay for broadband phone and sky TV basic package and that's excluding any free months on offer at the moment. It has all the services like series record and record 2 channels etc and a full epg unlike my current free to air. The UI seems good and Its a free installation too. It's great to see that it may shake up the market so I say bring it on!
bk wrote: » Well my own personal opinion is that it is a very poor service, with a limited range of channels, limited features and relatively bad value for money. It really isn't a good price point when you factor in that it requires the overly expensive Eircom eFibre product in the first place. It may improve in the future, but as it stands now, it is of little benefit to the majority of people and is a very disappointing product. I want to see more competition in the TV and Broadband market, but this really isn't it.
tui0hcg wrote: » I really dont get all the anti eVision sentiments that are going on in this and other threads. Its a basic service at a good price point for many and is a good addition to the TV market place. It may not suit everyone but what will?
tui0hcg wrote: » I dont think Sky are too keen on people having free multi room sets up either. Eircom have obviously built a box to try to stop this so I dont see how its a drawback. There are drawbacks to everything but IMHO eVision has its strenghts and weaknesses just like everything else For the typical user all they want is a TV service in the room they have their main TV and this box will do that job without issue. It will record, series link, show Irish and UK TV, has no set up fee, is moveable and all for a good price and all on one remote control. I really dont get all the anti eVision sentiments that are going on in this and other threads. Its a basic service at a good price point for many and is a good addition to the TV market place. It may not suit everyone but what will?
tui0hcg wrote: » I dont think Sky are too keen on people having free multi room sets up either. Eircom have obviously built a box to try to stop this so I dont see how its a drawback.
bk wrote: » As eVision boxes only have HDMI out, it won't be possible to do a free "multiroom" with eVision. This is a definite drawback of eVision (along with many others).
tui0hcg wrote: » Wow you love bashing eVision. We realise that it may not be all singing and dancing and it's not for you but give it a break.
tui0hcg wrote: » Is there full 7 day EPG for all channels?
tui0hcg wrote: » Is there a series record function?
tui0hcg wrote: » Is the box easily movable (i.e. not tied to a cable feed but to a network connection through the homeplugs)
bk wrote: » As eVision boxes only have HDMI out, it won't be possible to do a free "multiroom" with eVision. This is a definite drawback of eVision (along with many others). With Sky, you can "mirror" the output of your Sky box to a second, third, etc. TV UPC has the 17 basic analogue channels (not available in Cork) that can be used as a free multiroom in a second room. The UPC Horizon box also has the ability to stream channels to a laptop or tablet. I think Eircom will have to do something similar to Horizon and allow free streaming to a laptop or tablet to improve the competitiveness of eVision.