user2011 wrote: » Goal line set at 3.5 @ 11/10 and over 3.0, 3.5 @ 1.975
user2011 wrote: » Asked that question in the match thread, I can't think of any game where United were so long not even CL games. United drifted as far as 5/1 with Stan James :eek:
Lamposts wrote: » Odds are so high because Jose hasnt lost a home game as Chelsea manager in the prem ever. Safer bet is probably double chance with UTD.
mike65 wrote: » Atromitos away to Greek basement side Aris 1.90 for the win
Irish94 wrote: » #mufc starting XI vs Chelsea: De Gea; Rafael, Evans, Vidic, Evra; Valencia, Carrick, Jones, Young; Januzaj, Welbeck. #mufc subs vs Chelsea: Lindegaard, Giggs, Smalling, Hernandez, Cleverley, Fletcher, Kagawa Team v Man U: Cech; Ivanovic, Cahill, Terry (c), Azpilicueta; Ramires, David Luiz; Willian, Oscar, Hazard; Eto’o. #CFC Substitutes v Man U: Schwarzer, Cole, Mikel, Matic, Lampard, Mata, Torres. #CFC
Lasagna Diarra wrote: » Monaco : Subasic - Raggi, Carvalho, Abidal (cap.), Kurzawa - Toulalan, Obbadi, Kondogbia - Rodriguez - Germain, Falcao Ranieri sticks with the wingerless tactic that clearly doesn't work for them... 3 defensive midfielders, no Moutinho, Ocampos or Ferreira-Carrasco, Germain who hasn't scored a goal this season, starts upfront, Raggi at RB even though he brings absolutely nothing going forward unlike Fabinho... Monaco are usually an underish team, but with this line up I can't see a goalfest here. Toulouse are a defensive minded team, they got a 0-0 draw away to Monaco earlier this season. Under 2.5 @ 1.53 (Monaco 2-1 @ 7.50 just in case) Germain anytime @ 4.75 could be worth a tiny bet considering he's playing alongside Falcao
markc91 wrote: » Try get yourself a marathon bet account mate i do all your bets on there always better prices for instance, under 2.5 is 1.86 on there!
Lasagna Diarra wrote: » Yea I know they have great odds, but they don't have a licence to operate here. They do have a French version of their website though, not sure why...
markc91 wrote: » They have 2 sites .com and .co.uk did you try both?
Dio On The Doubles wrote: » Levante Las Planas women are the whipping girls of the Spain women's league. They host Rayo ladies at 11.30 todayhttp://ie.soccerway.com/matches/2014/01/19/spain/superliga/levante-las-planas/rayo-vallecano-de-madrid/1556853/head2head/ Their away form has seen some big drubbings in the 5+ goals area, but recently their home form has seen the score lower in the u2.5 bracket. Rayo should be a step above the teams that went under 2.5 in Levante and have the H2H results to prove it. No markets really yet but I'm gonna take goal line 4 if it's going. Hopefully the recent unders at home for Levante encourage the bookies to keep the line low.
squirrelohara wrote: » United team looks cat compared to Chelsea. Chelsea to win to nil - 2/1 Chelsea (-1) - 11/5
bradlente wrote: » Having a go with Hazard anytime tomorrow @3.7.3 in his last 4.Would like to back a penalty in the match too but the odds are crap. Two conservative managers but the stats for goals tomorrow are interesting.Chelsea averaging 2+goals a game at home and conceding 0.8.Utd have only failed to score once in ten away games and besides two other games at City and Norwich where they only scored once,They've scored at least 2 in every game,That's 7/10 away games where they've scored at least 2 goals.They're conceding plenty as well,Only two clean sheets albeit in there last 3 games.But they came against fairly poor attacks(Norwich and Villa). The game at OT,Chelsea and Utds games vs Arsenal and both the managers tactics(and maybe their H2H goals) make a case for the the unders but based on the above I'm taking the overs here.This game hasn't gone unders in the league since '09.2-1,3-3 and 2-3 since then.
RobbingBandit wrote: » I'm a United fan didn't feel too optimistic about the match today so tried for an odd one at 50/1 Eto'O 1st goal Chelsea 3-1, every cloud has a silver lining.
Shane St. wrote: » Liverpool let me down badly in a treble. They were just so poor in the 1st half. No matter, I'm getting on Chelsea 2mrw. Can't see them messing up w IrDA injury problems and mourinhos big game know how
mailburner wrote: » seems awful short at 50s to be fair i'd imagine there was much bigger prices available elsewhere