Mod Post: A reminder to folks that trying to bait supporters by posting alternate names for a football club may lead to a yellow card. Folk are welcome to post in any superthread they wish to, but nobody is free to use superthreads or this forum in general as somewhere to try and bait/flame/troll other posters.
weldoninhio wrote: » Don't you mean new, new club.
TheBuilder wrote: » Deja vu, absolute joke we're in this mess again, just feel totally scunnered. Have to laugh at some of the posters flocking in here though. Said it before, for the decent celtic fans I wouldnt wish this nonsense on you.
Soups123 wrote: » It's shocking to see it happen again Club football is all about derby games and winning trophies the league has been **** without them almost pointless As a fan that enjoys football I'd much rather see Rangers back in the Prem than gone for another 5 yrs
Hagar the Nice. wrote: » They have never been in the top flight,they are a new entity.
Soups123 wrote: » Since when did entities play football You and I know like everyone else who they are and that's why you still enjoy watching them suffer
Jelle1880 wrote: » But that was another club I thought ? :pac:
Jelle1880 wrote: » No no, you don't get it, he's that obsessed with a completely new club. But it's also the old Rangers who have the refs in their pockets and get penalties all over the place. It's not that difficult :pac:
TheBuilder wrote: » Don't even rise to him, let him rabble on
Dempsey wrote: » New club, same fans
LiamoSail wrote: » Perhaps I'm looking at this wrong, but my understanding of the situation is as follows RIFC own Rangers Football Club. RIFC are owed a substantial amount by Rangers Football Club. Approximately 13% of shares in RIFC were bought by fans at a vastly inflated price of 70p per share Rangers Football Club are hemorrhaging money. The model, with that level of expenditure is unsustainable. Couple the excess football related expenditure with what the board are drawing, and administration is inevitable. In the event of administration, RIFC the only creditor of Rangers Football Club would get the assets, ie Ibrox. At that point, RIFC's interest in football will cease, and their existence will solely be as a company which owns ibrox, and makes it available for lease. Any reincarnation of Rangers Football Club will hence have to rent Ibrox, ensuring a healthy income stream for RIFC. For this reason, I don't think shares in RIFC are worthless. They were certainly overvalued at 70p, but the vast majority of shares bought weren't bought for that price. Institutional investors paid far less, and its clear why now. As long as there is a club playing out of Ibrox, RIFC will have a healthy income stream. That club however, won't even own its own ground, or benefit from the primary source of income for big Scottish clubs; match day revenue Anyone got any thoughts on the above, or corrections?
Raman Bhardwaj @STVRaman 1m Rangers say no player will be made available for interview for today's media conference ahead of match v Forfar.
Dempsey wrote: » I wonder if Lamb will be on tomorrow's menu
Jelle1880 wrote: » Good move by Ally, backed the players and turning the attention back on the board by asking about boardroom cuts first.
Dempsey wrote: » Was it his decision to not allow players to speak to the media? Just remember how long it took him to take his pay cut as he grandstands to the supporters & players
Jelle1880 wrote: » Probably. He pretty clearly came out that it's not the players or fans who are responsible for this mess. A pre-match press conference is also not the place to focus on wages, the press know perfectly well who to contact if they want stories.
RoryMac wrote: » Has anyone asked Ally why he needs a squad of 50+ players with quite a lot on several thousand a week while playing in the Scottish League 1?