snubbleste wrote: » Were they not 65g back in the day?
Big Steve wrote: » I think they were. If that is the case the bar has gotten 26.15% smaller yet the price hasn't reflected this.
drunkmonkey wrote: » The bar has got smaller but my belly is 25% bigger
loveisdivine wrote: » They've reduced the size in order to meet their goal of having all bars under 250kcals, or something around there. Its for our own good dont ya know. Of course the price has not gone down to reflect this.
Fratton Fred wrote: » Damn healthy living nazis making our chocolate bars smaller.
Michael D Not Higgins wrote: » More to do with the price of cocoa going up and the choice is between a price increase or a smaller bar.
The Backwards Man wrote: » I remember when a strawberry penny mouse was the size of your fist. And only cost a penny!
preston johnny wrote: » Don't get your snickers in a twix Fred.
MonaPizza wrote: » Smartie-pants
Lapin wrote: » I predict a whole Galaxy of chocolate bar puns here !
electrobanana wrote: » let try to keep it on topic lads
Ruubot2 wrote: » Daim you lot, now I'm craving chocolate bars! :mad::mad: