crazygeryy wrote: » It just happened. It's an infection of some sort.
Michael Weston wrote: » Ray starting the show giving out about the government and Catholic church, like a broken record taking on all the populist issues. This show is so tired at this stage it needs to be brought out and shot, even as I write this he's speaking in a language that he's developed for him and Tom! Give me strength
BaZmO* wrote: » A bit like your posts so.
Swiper the fox wrote: » He wonders why the Catholic church give more gravitas to the opinions of Mary McAleese than they do of his, it's like comparing the opinions of Miriam O'Callaghan and Pele on the state of Brazilian football.
FunLover18 wrote: » Talking about the Jenni Lauren case and a woman texts in about her own experience on a flight; Ray: And that texts comes in from Lauren ... is that a coincidence? Will: Yes, there are loads of Laurens out there Ray: Are there?
JM Skipton wrote: » In fairness to him he was correct, the Catholic Church were being hypocritical by not commenting on one case(Mary McAleese) but commenting on another(Ray D'Arcy) I would be in complete agreement with Ray on this occasion.And it's not about which personality is higher up the celebrity chain than the other the fact is the Catholic church yet again lacked any sort of consistency
Swiper the fox wrote: » But my main gripe here is how his ego allows him to compare his own off the cuff musings with the well thought out remarks of one of our greatest ever statespeople.
BPKS wrote: » Exactly. The issue here was that the Church said they do not comment on opinions on the church expressed by individuals when asked what they thought about McAleese's comments. But a while back the same man gave an interview to the Indo commenting on what Darcy had said on his radio show about the Church.
kunst nugget wrote: » Mary McAleese's remarks weren't a pre-written statement but as part of an interview with the Scottish based Herald newspaper so in essence they would have been off the cuff as well.
Swiper the fox wrote: » Sorry, I was aware of that, however it's something which she has probably given some thought to and not just some quick quip to encourage a few idiots to text in whoopin and hollerin about what a great fella she is after she woke up on the wrong side of the bed!
Ash.J.Williams wrote: » she's put some thought into alright! If going to Rome to study a degree in canon law is "some" thought!!
Ash.J.Williams wrote: » just listen to all the texts read out on darcy....look at all the tweets sent to todayfm while he's on air, and read all the comments on facebook, and think that Ray Darcy is the spokesman to those people....how can anything he ever says be taken seriously by anyone! ...and i should know i'm a 7.4 trucker/pigfarmer from carlow, dancing around the town with me 3 year old.
Michael Weston wrote: » I think I saw you this morning!! Had you two pigs with you aswell ?
6781 wrote: » Wasn't it a STD/I or something?
ncmc wrote: » I don’t know if it’s just because I’m irritable today, but Ray is really bugging me this morning. First of all, he had a chap on who had lost his 4 year old on the Luas when the buggy he was pushing got stuck and the daughter had already hopped on. Ray immediately went on sanctimonious mode telling him that it was a lesson learned for him blah, blah, basically implied it was the fathers fault rather than a freak occurance. Then he had Gary Linekar on and read a text from a listener who said Ray could pass for Gary’s older brother (despite Ray being 5 years younger :pac:) Ray went full on defensive mode about he has to get up at 6am with young kids and how Gary was able to spend time in Barbados, blah, blah. Jesus, there’s a man that really can’t take a joke.
Ash.J.Williams wrote: » i actually heard that! It did sound like he was talking down to him