SAORVIEW RE-SCAN OCT 21ST 2013 Due to technical enhancements to the SAORVIEW service, as part of the ongoing process of expanding the platform, viewers are required to carry out a rescan of their SAORVIEW television or set-top box from Monday 21st October. Failure to re-scan will result in eventual loss of service. Re-tuning is simple, go to the menu on your tv or set top box and find the option to re-tune, scan or search for channels. Instructions will be found in your TV or set-top box manual or for more information about how to re-tune, click on ourGuide to Re-Scanning SAORVIEW APPROVED Equipment. There is also an information helpline available, call 1890 222 012http://www.saorview.ie/news/saorview-re-scan-oct-21st-2013/
Peter Rhea wrote: » Mux 2 is the same spec. signal as mux 1, just transmitted within a different 8 mHz of UHF bandwidth.
Karsini wrote: » Maybe the aerial shifted due to the high winds? Not impossible.
timmy4u2 wrote: » . . .Up until monday of the HD all channels were working fine. From Monday on RTE 1 HD was disappearing or freezing and fluctuating down to 0 and up to 30% . He tried rescans, he tried changing to another cable run, he tried bypassing the amp. Nothing worked. Today I moved the aerial a degree or two and RTE 1 is back perfect. Incidentally it is channel 44.
Peter Rhea wrote: » Is this the attic aerial you mentioned in an earlier post? Maybe someone went up to get Christmas decorations or something & it got a bit of a knock?
timmy4u2 wrote: » The aerial is fixed and solid and I had to use spanners to get it to move.
Peter Rhea wrote: » This is near the Limerick/Kerry border? Channels 44 & 47 there should be the Cnoc an Oir transmitter: is the aerial pointing that way (west or northwest) & is it vertically polarised?
timmy4u2 wrote: » Its remarkable that a poster in Lietrim and a poster in Kildare have the same problem with RTE1
Peter Rhea wrote: » Nothing remarkable at all. Just 3 aerial installations that were poorly done to begin with or have deteriorated with time.
timmy4u2 wrote: » If they were poorly installed how come they, or at least my friends, performed without a problem and with full signal strength on all channels; and then on the day of change to HD RTE1 went to zero at times and 10% at other times.
Peter Rhea wrote: » Just coincidence. No change was made that would affect the robustness of the transmitted signal i.e. the ability of a receiver to continue decoding it, all other things being the same as before. Maybe the problem was caused by a temporary increase in interference from Woodcock Hill (same channels) that might have gone away without your intervention. Turning the aerial probably lessened the interfering signal. Does the Saorview coverage map recommend Cnoc an Oir for that particular location?
timmy4u2 wrote: » . . . a few smart guys told him his aerial could not work from the attic
Peter Rhea wrote: » Digital TV is all-or-nothing, with a sudden & complete failure point. It can 'work' on a just-adequate signal but, if you don't have some extra signal margin, the slightest deterioration will render it ususable.
lost101 wrote: » Can anyone suggest how much longer this situation may continue?
watty wrote: » No doubt if Oireachtas TV launches in HD
Jpmarn wrote: » My sister lives east of Ballyvaughan Co.Clare. She has an aerial faced north west towards Cliften and Casla transmitter. There is a hill blocking signals to her from Maghera. She is getting mux 1 perfectly. But there is no way she could pick up mux 2. There seems to be a widespread problem around the country that the transmission of mux 2 is weaker than mux 1. It is frustrating for people in marginal reception areas and other technical problems to fail to pick up mux 2 and RTE One HD. Can anyone in the trade or here browsing the tv threads elaborate the reasons why the transmission of mux 2 being relatively weak?
timmy4u2 wrote: » . . . All said it was just a coincidence that RTE 1 changed at the time. There is so much evidence here now that it certanly cannot be a coincidence. I solved his problem by moving the aerial a few degrees.
Peter Rhea wrote: » I only see evidence of substandard receiving aerial installations. As mentioned above, there would be just as many people with better mux 2 reception than they have for mux 1. What 'change' do you think was made at RTE1 that could be counteracted by 'moving the aerial a few degrees'?