mrnobodyfan87 wrote: » Everyone is out to get you Stench Blossoms
Malcolm. wrote: » Not trying to be lads / ladyboys. It's nothing to do with their build. Some women can carry a bit of extra weight very well, and are in fact the better for it, some can't.
Malcolm. wrote: » Not trying to be lads / ladyboys, but whatever floats your boat.
It's nothing to do with their build. Some women can carry a bit of extra weight very well, and are in fact the better for it, some can't.
Stench Blossoms wrote: » What do you mean by 'not trying to be lads'? Is weight training a lads only thing?
Czarcasm wrote: » Usual condescending massive multi quote reply -
Wibbs wrote: » Hang on, have we gone back to the 1950's here? For my personal taste, few enough can. Then again personal tastes differ and if others like bigger women then game ball. Goes the other way too. I've known a few women who say they prefer a "cuddly" man, over a lean one, never mind a guy with any muscles. Then again 9 times outa 10 they're usually cuddly themselves. Maybe that's a general thing, that people tend to go for similar body shapes to themselves? I'm thin so I prefer thin women sorta thing.
Malcolm. wrote: » Nothing to do with their weight or build whatsoever. As I said if women trying to be lads / ladyboys floats your boat, work away.
Tasden wrote: » So its the laddish personality you don't like? You realise that has nothing to do with their fitness regime?
Malcolm. wrote: » Yes, do you ?
Tasden wrote: » So why are you giving out about laddish behaviour on a thread about fitness?
Malcolm. wrote: » I'm not the one giving out , there are lots of opinions here, and fit does not necessarily mean to everyone how much you can bench press or howfast you can run 100m. As I keep saying, whatever floats you boat. Knock yourself out.
Duck's hoop wrote: » It says to me that they're just not comfortable with a woman who is motivated to keep in shape. Judging by your next super judgmental quote about your brother, you're not very motivated about looking after yourself either! And that's grand. But no need to slate someone else because they look like they do look after themselves.
cantdecide wrote: » Forgive my ignorance but as I'm not very knowledgeable of the world of fitness but is there any practical reason or any competitive reason or sport where getting body fat to an extreme minimum or is it often/ mainly/ always about aesthetics only?? Seeing the sacrifices that extremely lean/ trim women have to make is very eye opening. It seems that building up and embracing the curves is such a completely different proposition to trimming down.
Malcolm. wrote: » Not trying to be lads / ladyboys, but whatever floats your boat. It's nothing to do with their build. Some women can carry a bit of extra weight very well, and are in fact the better for it, some can't.
DebDynamite wrote: » December 2013 above me beat me to listing the health benefits of lifting weights. Now, can you explain what you mean by the bolded part above? What are the health benefits for women who carry "a bit of extra weight"?
DebDynamite wrote: » What are the health benefits for women who carry "a bit of extra weight"?
liliq wrote: » I think he means he finds excess weight attractive, (hopefully) rather than suggesting there could be health benefits.
Malcolm. wrote: » They get shagged.
Malcolm. wrote: » a bit is not "excessive", nor does it have any negative health implications. I don't like fat women, but we don't all like rattling a bag of skin and bones.
liliq wrote: » "Extra weight"= excess. It's fairly self explanatory, no? How can extra weight not have negative health implications? Any extra weight carries extra risk for osteoporosis, a range of heart disease, cancers, type 2 diabetes... ETA; that is coming from me as someone who is overweight so I'm not preaching. These are simple facts.
Malcolm. wrote: » You need to look up the word excessive
liliq wrote: » I wasn't the one who used the word excessive.
December2012 wrote: » Why is it that it's acceptable to refer to women in a derogatory sense as "skin and bones"? If a woman actually looks skin and bones she is seriously unhealthy and sick. I'm talking eating disorder / chemo treatment unhealthy - as in bad health. It is not a proper way to describe most women at all, irrespective of their fitness level.
Czarcasm wrote: » Malcolm I don't know where you got that image, but the woman in the picture on the left? If you look at it closely, you'll see it's badly photoshopped to shave a couple of inches off her waist. The other picture is also a gross exaggeration though.
liliq wrote: » So the picture on the left is meant to be someone with extra weight?! That just illustrates what is considered 'normal' by some people is unhealthily underweight.