inforfun wrote: » Damn...you ask and i deliver, isnt it?
inforfun wrote: » Odds on everything i fancy in the Dutch cup are terrible. Maybe apart from Heerenveen over 1.5 @2.62 That match could see a few corners as well, over 10.5 Asian @1.25 Will take that in a double
hefferboi wrote: » Your man is reffing the AZ match too. No card markets on Bet365 so I wont be backing.
magherakid wrote: » Good shout game had kicked off when i seen it P.Walnuts
baz2009 wrote: » I've gone for West Ham to win and Danny Welbeck Insurebet 1st Scorer. 6/1 and 5/1. Just have a good feeling about West Ham and thought they were worth a go at 6/1. Welbeck scored twice on Sunday so that should give him some confidence going in as the lone striker tonight!
bradlente wrote: » Lots of talk about Evian home win tonight,3/4 in from 5/6 or better earlier.Don't think I'll take them now. Was thinking of taking a Real bet depending on the line-ups but after seeing the prices I'll leave it.The one thing that I might take is Olimpic +4 asian 7/8.They haven't conceded in 9 matches.Real only had 2 shots on target in the first tie as well. If you're brave Olimpic are 122/1 on betfair:D edit-Just realised after making the bet under 4.5 is the better option here @evens.Olimpic haven't conceded in 9 but they've only scored in one of those games as well! Missed out on a bit of value there..
bradlente wrote: » Lens -1 look a decent shout later,Price is dropping this morning got on at 2.5.Las would know more of course. Infor would Zwolles few injuries and getting beaten well by GAE lately not worry you?
bradlente wrote: » Going for Olhanense +2.5 away to Porto later,2.1. This bet has only lost once for Olhanense so far in the league(4-1 away to Braga a few weeks ago).The only time Porto have won by more than 2 goals was the second day of the season.A little bit risky as Porto haven't played the really poor teams in the league at home but Olhanense managed to score twice against Benfica last week so who knows.
P.Walnuts wrote: » Looks good, but its tomorrow right?