tdv123 wrote: » Neither. Most real Republicans these days regard him as a sellout. Martin McGuinness was giving a speech at the Bloody Sunday commemoration a few years ago & half the crowd walked away once he started speaking. SF is viewed as just another middle class nationalist party among Republicans. The IRA hasn't gone away and Republican groups are under no illusions of a quick British withdrawal their it for the long haul. Their just waiting for the British to make another blunder like Bloody Sunday or Falls curfew.
tippspur wrote: » Oh right, they took the path of peace so their the bad people,and you tell me the IRA are not gone away and are ready to pounce if the Brits make one wrong move,give me a break FFS.
tdv123 wrote: » Their not bad people for making peace. Their bad for running a 30 year war which achieved little at best & nothing at worse. Republicans are sick & tired of the rhetoric of Adams & McGuinnes & starting realize the peace process won't deliver Republican objectives. That's right they haven't masserene barracks shooting ring any bells? The IRA's now have more members than when the Provos were formed in the 69 split. What they really want is the BA back on the streets so they have clear targets.
WilyCoyote wrote: » A 30 year war? More like 50. And it achieved civil rights for the minority. Do you not like that picture?
tdv123 wrote: » 3,500 dead (majority civilians) & 50,000 injured for civil rights? Yeah that's not really anything to boast about it. The PIRA's goal was reunification & they gave up on it. Ruari O'Briadgh was clearly right in everything e said in the 86 SF split.
tdv123 wrote: » Their not bad people for making peace. Their bad for running a 30 year war which achieved little at best & nothing at worse. Republicans are sick & tired of the rhetoric of Adams & McGuinnes & starting realize the peace process won't deliver Republican objectives.That's right they haven't gone away, masserene barracks shooting ring any bells? The IRA's now have more members than when the Provos were formed in the 69 split. What they really want is the BA back on the streets so they have clear targets.
padma wrote: » Gerry Adams given the honour of being part of the coffin honour guard in mandela's final farewell speaks volumes of how closely tied the ANC and Sinn Fein have been for decades. As a politician Gerry Adams is a stand out politician more than any other Irish politician on the world stage.The likes of Kenny and Gilmores and rtes agenda in propaganda against Gerry Adams is quite damaging towards the peace process. The fact of the matter is people who support Sinn Fein in Ireland is a very high percentage of the whole Islands population. This makes the state worried and has done for the past few decades and even since the foundation of the current partition.
Richard Hillman wrote: » Oh ffs :pac:
WilyCoyote wrote: » It achieved civil rights for the beleaguered Nationalist population. That is what started the present Troubles. Or would you rather revert to the old days when the Nationalist population were bullied by officialdom, given inferior housing, few jobs and a police force that was more like the TonTon Macoutes?
padma wrote: » Gerry Adams given the honour of being part of the coffin honour guard in mandela's final farewell speaks volumes of how closely tied the ANC and Sinn Fein have been for decades. As a politician Gerry Adams is a stand out politician more than any other Irish politician on the world stage. The likes of Kenny and Gilmores and rtes agenda in propaganda against Gerry Adams is quite damaging towards the peace process. The fact of the matter is people who support Sinn Fein in Ireland is a very high percentage of the whole Islands population. This makes the state worried and has done for the past few decades and even since the foundation of the current partition.
Fr. Ned wrote: » What? Gerry Adams was part of the guard of honour and RTE don't even mention his name. Are you denying that there is a sustained media attack on Adams?
dxhound2005 wrote: » Someone in RTE is going to be in trouble for breaking the censorship.http://www.rte.ie/news/2013/1214/492849-mandela-adams/
dxhound2005 wrote: » He's not even a stand out politician in Louth. Not that he bothers to grace us with his presence very often.
Fr. Ned wrote: » Stick with the likes of Kirk. He and his fellow travellers have the interests of the country at heart...LOL.
WilyCoyote wrote: » Nobody (AFAIK) has questioned your intelligence or lack of. Your final sentence is the wishful thinking of a deluded personality The war is over and Britain has f***** up once again Amazing that Cameron thought Mandela a terrorist a few years back and last week lauded him. What changed his mind? Dementia? Or just the natural Britishness of speaking out of both sides of the mouth simultaneously.
Hannibal wrote: » I guarantee you that if Bono was part of the guard of honour we wouldn't hear the end of it. Gerry Adams gets swept under the carpet because it will embarass the media particularly RTE and Independent and it will also embarass our government for all the praise they gave Mandela yet it's Gerry Adams that represents Ireland and not any of them. Very few people in Ireland appreciate or see the bigger picture of Adams as a republican leader has achieved here and a lot of other politicians are jealous because Adams' legacy will live on for longer than theirs.
Axel Lamp wrote: » Terrorist. Lying filthy scumbag terrorist too.
Hannibal wrote: » Very few people in Ireland appreciate or see the bigger picture of Adams as a republican leader has achieved here and a lot of other politicians are jealous because Adams' legacy will live on for longer than theirs.
Fratton Fred wrote: » How would you describe someone who detonates a bomb outside a McDonald's on a Saturday lunch time? Explain to me how that protected Catholics?
Fr. Ned wrote: » Very insightful and well researched post.
Deleted User wrote: » While violence can't be condoned, do you think it's a co-incidence that Unionist became so much more amenable to power sharing, co-operation and dialogue AFTER the Troubles compared with before the Troubles?
Deleted User wrote: » Not to be triumphalist, but it was a long war of attrition, that made Unionists a lot less oppressive than they had been in up until the troubles.
LordSutch wrote: » ................. And we now have a position where the PIRA have disappeared and Adams actually condemns 'current' bombings & shootings. Who would have thought. The old buggar still maintains that the Troubles were a just cause,.............
Nodin wrote: » And he's right.
LordSutch wrote: » He's bloody well not, specially to the families of loved ones wont be around this Christmas courtesy of the Provo's. ...