CianRyan wrote: » At this time of year, they're still fetching over €4000 so it's a while off yet.
Cleveland Hot Pocket wrote: » Wasn't there an e60 in here a while back? If not it can't be long now till the early 530i models are bangernomics candidates.
CianRyan wrote: » Could have been both! I definitely remember E60's being mentioned too, I wouldn't say 'till the middle to end of next year though.
unkel wrote: » Wasn't that about the E60 BMW? TTs have been in here before iirc...
CianRyan wrote: » Someone said earlier this year that we'd get them in here by 2014. Good call!
unkel wrote: » This link shows you're probably right! It states "The D5 engine develops 163bhp", no mention of any other versions of the engine
PurvesGrundy wrote: » Eh.... it's 163bhp.;) Ireland or the UK never even received the 130bhp variant.
JohnBoy26 wrote: » It isn't either That miles though I bet as that looks to be an Irish car rather than an import. The car could still be fine though depending on how it was looked after.
unkel wrote: » It's only 130BHP, that's pretty poor for a 2.4 liter 5 cylinder of that era (it's taxed as a 2.5, so even worse again)
nd wrote: » I was thinking 183k kms wasn't too bad
nd wrote: » 98 colt, new nct, 750 eurohttp://cars.donedeal.ie/cars-for-sale/look-bargain-spotless-colt-/6028366
mondymike wrote: » Can't think of much, although find out why it needed a new engine, and at 120k it would be due belts etc, arches on the polos used to rust, best of luck with it thou, looks well,
Nal wrote: » Probably going to take a look at this either tonight or tomorrow. Anything to look out for lads?http://cars.donedeal.ie/cars-for-sale/seat-cordoba-nct-tax-april-2014/6111867
mondymike wrote: » Just got my bangernomic car. 1995 Nissan sunny auto, 2 mnth test, 7 mnth tax, has elec windows and overdrive for the auto box, but that just makes it louder n thirsty! Pics to follow, badly needs a compound, 90s reds don't age well!
Moneymaker wrote: » It feels much more powerful then that when you put your foot down.
unkel wrote: » It's only 130BHP, that's pretty poor for a 2.4 liter 5 cylinder of that era (it's taxed as a 2.5, so even worse again) If you want a V70, the 2l petrol is a far better choice for your motor tax dollars