IrishProd wrote: » Why are Fianna Fáil, Fine Gael, RTE & the Independent obsessed with Sinn Féin? Especially Micheal Martin, Niall Collins, Brian Hayes and Alan Shatter? Why? Anytime economic issues or political issues that are relevant are in the media somehow it is always turned into a Sinn Féin or Gerry Adams bashfest. Has anyone else noticed? Is it smearing? All I have read in the papers and listened from RTE for over the last 3 months is how bad Sinn Féin and Gerry Adams are? Is it because Sinn Féin are a threat to the status quo and their past is just used as a smokescreen to vilify them in order to scare voters into voting for the usual gombeens?
Foxhound38 wrote: » People tend to get villified when they are connected with murdering people... So be life
The Golden Miller wrote: » The media has a lot to answer for here in the south with their anti-nationalist agenda. It's nothing new, and has been like this for the past 15 years or so. You can see the influence daily even on this website. 20 years ago do you think half the population would be looking at everything from the British perspective, apologising for their actions here and distracting any British wrong doing from the point with their IRA whataboutary? ... Eoghan Harris... now a UUP advisor. Conor Cruise O'Brien
Banjo String wrote: » Sinn Féin have been connected with murdering people The actual party????
Foxhound38 wrote: » Indeed, don't spread it around but some believe it to have had connections with the Provisional IRA! :eek:
coolhull wrote: » The problem is, my cat knows more about economics than SF
Banjo String wrote: » The only political party in Ireland that had connections to the IRA
Femme_Fatale wrote: » Yeh criticism of the IRA is only right, and SF and Gerry Adams and McGuinness deserve criticism (other individuals within SF I don't mind so much) but it's the above stuff I don't get - it's utterly baffling. Harris seems barmy though. I mean, Ruth Dudley Edwards I understand, because she is of unionist stock anyway. But Harris and Cruise-O'Brien and anyone Irish who's only critical of republican atrocities rather than atrocities across the board, and sycophantic towards hardline unionists, and dismissive of atrocities towards nationalists, and airbrushing what led to the civil rights movement... wtf is wrong with them?
porsche959 wrote: » For all that people give out about FF and Bertie, if John Brutal was left in charge in 1997 the peace process would probably be dead in the water or at best in its infancy.
NuckingFacker wrote: » as opposed to a bluffer teacher from Mayo or a man with a record of ruthlessness to ordinary people such as noonan? Pierce Doherty has a good grasp. I like him as it happens. or are you referring to Lenihan, or Bertie, or Bruton? Yeah, great grasp there. Well, grasping anyway.
road_high wrote: » "Good grasp" of what exactly? Those cheap, populist sound-bites opposing everything he spouts ad nauseum? Trademark SF.
K-9 wrote: » an organisation that saw Gardai and Army as legitimate targets.
rockatansky wrote: » Which organisation is that now?
Fentdog84 wrote: » listening to charlie flanagan(FG) on prime time tonight talking about Gerry adams ''no moral compass etc''. Hypocrisy at its worst. The attitude from southern politicians towards the conflict on the north has always struck me as disingenous and populist. Its like they have no real understanding of the conflict and they only seem to spout phrases like IRA murderers, its disgraceful etc same with RTE makes you wonder. No backbone our politicians have, they're embarrassing
Deleted User wrote: » Thats true. Also the funny thing is didnt FF once refer to themselves as the Republican party? and the reason they were established was because of their own opposition to the fact that 6 of the counties remained part of Britain? Of course good old Charlie and Kevin Boland then with the arms tribunal. All conveniently forgotten by Micheal Martin and co.
The Golden Miller wrote: » Baffling is an understatement. On another note, how can I never run into a gal like you on a night out ha
dxhound2005 wrote: » Pearse is indeed a genius of economics. He figured out how to bring in €800 million a year by applying a 1% wealth tax to assets worth over €1 million. But the €1 million could not include any of the following, not the full list: The first 20% of the family home and the ordinary contents of the home All business assets including land, buildings machinery that are used for generating and sustaining employment Shares in private trading companies Working farm land, livestock and bloodstock Pension fundshttp://www.sinnfein.ie/files/2012/WealthTaxDocument.pdf And the wealth tax includes an inability to pay clause. Genius indeed. And draconian measures against evaders. Which is very odd from a man who chose to be a tax evader. Not a good recommendation for a future Minister for Finance. But now it seems Pearse may be having a change of heart on the wealth tax.
THE disclosure by Fine Gael leader Michael Noonan that the party was forced to make a £111,000 tax settlement with the Revenue Commissioners was a last-minute panic decision, it can be revealed. Mr Noonan has sought to claim credit for coming clean about Fine Gael's illegal under-the-counter cash payments to staff. He did this by falsely giving the impression that his disclosure, timed for RTÉ's 9pm News on Friday, was further evidence of Fine Gael's desire to own up to past illegality.Mr Noonan has also attempted to deflect attention from Fine Gael's illegality by trying to implicate other political parties in what is substantially an unrelated issue.
Foxhound38 wrote: » With the provos, yes. Oh wait, there was that one time some FF politicians tried to send the provos weapons - so two connections I guess.