nd wrote: » and something unusual, no idea if it's overpriced 93 corolla wagon 1.3, Nct 02/15, 900 eurohttp://cars.donedeal.ie/cars-for-sale/toyota-corolla-wagon-1-3-nctd-02-15/6026447
nd wrote: » and something unusual, no idea if it's overpriced 93 corolla wagon 1.3, Nct 02/15, 900 eurohttp://cars.donedeal.ie/cars-for-sale/toyota-corolla-wagon-1-3-nctd-02-15/6026447 [...]
joujoujou wrote: » I'd say it is overpriced indeed. 1.3 (more than likely 74 bhp 4E-FE) engine in wagon? Insufficient. Tyres are damaged, btw. :pac:
Old diesel wrote: » [...] The previous model Corolla did have 74 bhp in 1.3 form if I recall correctly - they were 12 valves. [...]
Kaiser D wrote: » Audi 100 Avant 2.0 Petrol 170k Miles NCT 6/14 €2350 I'm sure this could be bought within budget. It'd make a nice family bus and its something different compared to the usual stuff.
joujoujou wrote: » AFAIR there were 1st Gen 4E-FE used until 1996, 74 bhp. 2nd Gen 88 bhp. You probably mention 2E, 1.3 12v engine, 65 to 82 bhp.
JohnBoy26 wrote: » Nope the first gen 4e fe in the corolla had 87bhp;)http://www.parkers.co.uk/cars/reviews/facts-and-figures/toyota/corolla/estate-1992/6520/
JohnBoy26 wrote: » Sorry to say this but that car isn't one bit genuine. The seats are changed, the clocks are changed etc etc. Id be avoiding tbh.
rizzodun wrote: » Can't see the value in this at all myself, can someone enlighten me?
Kaiser D wrote: » A large family wagon, with a capable engine and auto 'box, with a years NCT for €2000 (after haggling). Nicer than an A6 Avant imo.
Old diesel wrote: » And no one said bangernomics had to be "sensible. So those of us who are enthusiasts could go mad and break the normal rules from time to time Afterall - if a Mk 2 Jetta 1.6 D arrived in bangernomics territory - I might just have to buy it for no good reason at all :D Even the creator of Bangernomics himself Mr James Ruppert (spelled his surname incorrectly) is running a BMW 728i these days
rizzodun wrote: » I completely agree on the sensible part, just don't see the appeal myself, different strokes for different folks...
rizzodun wrote: » How about this then? Tested until 05/2014 but no mention of tax, €1600http://cars.donedeal.ie/cars-for-sale/nissan-pulsar-vzr/5569780
JohnBoy26 wrote: » Bangernotnomics. It's an overpriced ball of dung IMO.
CianRyan wrote: » Because if the paint? If that was a 1.4 with normal paint you'd probably think it's alright, yet a VZR with a bit of a dodgy paint job is a ball of dung? That comment is a ball if dung.
Kaiser D wrote: » Gotta question why its so cheap though
CianRyan wrote: » Most VZR's go for that kind of money, they don't get the same following as EK's. So, writing off a decent car just because of the paint? Can not agree with that sense, especially when you're talking sub €1500, no way he expects to get the full asking. I think if it did buy it, I'd whack a coat of grey primer over it and leave it. It's a weird one but a mate if mine did it to his EG and it looks really well. For less than €50 too.
rizzodun wrote: » I'd hardly write it off based on the paint job, would some people rather a perfect car on the surface but rubbish mechanically? If it checked out I'd overlook the paint job, they're less common than the 1.4, and the price could be wrangled down.