P.Walnuts wrote: » When people abuse/kill animals they are killing a creature who is also defenceless at at the mercy of the person, so any act carried out not of necessity but of pure cruelty. Now, I'm not for a second comparing crimes against children against crimes against animals, but I think there is a common theme there of helplessness on the victims side, and power and cruelty on the perpetrators side.
LexieOnRale wrote: » Let bad people repent all they like, they are still always going to be bad people. Would you leave a child in the care of someone who molested a child years previously, but was now "a good person"? I know I wouldn't
btard wrote: » My dog gives me loyalty and unconditional love.
Gatling wrote: » OK do people on hers have sex their dogs and horses , Unconditional love and undying love surely if you love your pets that much more than fellow humans I'd say more than a few take it to the next level
Jernal wrote: » Because one thing generally brings universal condemnation. The viewpoints on animal cruelty and how to tackle it tend to be far more dispersed. The level of conversation in a thread isn't an indicator of how much people care about something. Because odds are you have the same few posters keeping the thread alive. Everyone else has long since left.
UCDVet wrote: » If I make a list of the qualities I find positive and a list of the qualities I find negative; generally speaking, animals are 'better people' than most people I know.
zenno wrote: » Jesus christ man snap out of it. That's a twisted comment to make.
HansHolzel wrote: » Did it bite them and let them suffer and weaken for weeks before finally killing and eating them?
Gatling wrote: » Don't worry I'm sure secret's are safe on here
zenno wrote: » It's just strange in how you decided to turn this thread into an animal sex farm scenario. Quite odd indeed.
Kess73 wrote: » There was a dead dog and the owner of the dog gave an interview to the Limerick Leader newspaper. Also the first letter to the paper was signed and that person came forward. From what I remember about that incident the only anonymous letter was the one that was supposedly from a student who claimed to be present when the dog was killed, and who was saying that no students were at fault.
Jimoslimos wrote: » I never understand this. Why are these particularly attractive qualities? These can be dangerous in humans never mind animals. Most cults and religious organisations are founded on these.
Gatling wrote: » Unrequinted love and unconditional love for an animal over another human ,because there loyal and obidiant aka submissive Animal sex farm no common fact people take there love for a pets to higher levels
HansHolzel wrote: » Oh the luxury of your list-making.Domesticated animals are only a narrow part of the animal kingdom.
realies wrote: » Why do some people care more about animals than humans ? In the thread about the horse being set on fire the debate here is still ongoing,with rightly outrage against what happened,even though it has been reported that the poor horse was already dead. In the thread about the very unfortunate homeless man who was set on fire and beaten the thread is barely causing a ripple. My own opinion is that while the two incidents are very serious the murder of the human being should take huge preference over the horse.
LexieOnRale wrote: » Contrary to popular belief, humans aren't more superior to any other living creature.
Clandestine wrote: » Seriously? We have so many things that mankind has accomplished... trips to foreign planets... mathematics.. philosophy... etc. and yet somehow they are not "more superior" than any other living creature? What has any other animal accomplished? Nothing of significance, that for sure. Humans are above and beyond all other creatures on this earth.
looking_around wrote: » And no other animal destroys life & land to the extent we do. yep, we are superior :rolleyes:
LOSTfan57 wrote: » so its grand to burn them?
Clandestine wrote: » Humans also build and create infrastructure. Humans are still superior in many other regards.. we are not lesser because some corporations decide to cut down forests on a large scale.
looking_around wrote: » Some animals have infrastructure.. ants & bees come to mind. Just because we manage to create a world of things we 'need', that we never needed. Does not makes us better. Like I said we destroy more than any animal does, that's enough of a reason not to be considered superior. __ On OP topic, I would quicker save an animal than a humans life. If I had to pick between them. Human population is larger than most animals. Therefore meaning those animals need saving more than the human. ~shrugs~