lotusm wrote: » Can't understand how Cork airport does not have transatlantic flights from a business perspective. Its obviously because to protect Shannon airport. Cork airport is losing out big time on this. It needs to break away from the DAA. It has been reported that knock are hoping to have transatlantic flights to Boston and new York by 2015 which will be a massive boost for tourism and businesses. Surely if it can be done there, Cork can do the same
Rhys Essien wrote: » Its sad to say but Knock already had transatlantic flights for 6 months during 2007.That just tells you how much Cork airport are purposely been 'kept down'.http://www.irishcentral.com/news/No-New-Carrier-for-Knock-Airport-1130.html
Missyelliot2 wrote: » But for people that live anywhere near limerick or Clare, Shannon is so much more convenient -the roads from limerick to cork are atrocious ...and dangerous. There's no point travelling to cork then.
podmu80 wrote: » Plenty of cork people travel to Shannon on that god forsaken road. The base and demand exist for transatlantic from cork imo. I would love to know the full facts ad to why the DAA hasn't been fully broken up. Is Shannon heavily reliant on its American routes?
Pitcairn wrote: » Cork Airport doesn't have its own board. The Dublin Airport Authority operates Dublin and Cork Airports and has a board of directors. Here is the 2012 annual report which lists the board members.http://www.daa.ie/daa_ar_2012/ Undoubtedly if Cork Airport was a separate entity or at least allowed to go about securing its own routes we would have a transatlantic flight by now, perhaps on a trial basis.
Pitcairn wrote: » THe strange thing is that Shannon is no longer part of the DAA and is semi-independent. So you would think it should free up the DAA to try and bring a transatlantic route to Cork. I heard the DAA are telling Cork they may try and bring back the Cork to Dublin flight so passengers can connect to transatlantic flights in Dublin. That sounds useless to me. Even if there was a Cork to Dublin flight I'd still either drive to Shannon or else fly to London where there are more options.
podmu80 wrote: » Thanks for that. I know its under the control of the DAA, just wanted info on the people involved. Is such a practice, one airport basically under the control of another, that commonplace in the aviation industry, are there other examples? Even if cork airport can never be fully independent,surely things can be done to improve the current situation. A route to New York for example would it really have such an effect on numbers through Dublin,or is it purely to protect Shannon?
podmu80 wrote: » What does semi independent mean? The road to Shannon is terrible from cork, Dublin airport is much easier to get to.Hasn't cork been left to service the debt of the new terminal, I guess its semi independent too, just not in a good way! Would the airport be even running at 60% of its capacity I wonder? A return of the Dublin route would be welcome but as you say, in terms of transatlantic its not enough when you are looking at it from a business,inward investment viewpoint.
Rhys Essien wrote: » Have you trouble spelling Cork with a capital 'C'.??? I see you have no trouble with Dublin,Shannon and New York.
podmu80 wrote: » Sweet Jesus. Accept my most humble apology. Cork. Cork. Cork.
wallycharlo wrote: » Ryanair made a play some time back to take over the old terminal at Cork, and make it into a Ryanair hub. The powers that be were having none of it. I'm quite sure that this would have brought in many new routes.
lisasimpson wrote: » heard that ages ago. is there anything in the old building up there
kub wrote: » Just re the old terminal, in the long term the plan is to double the existing terminal down towards the old one. Therefore I imagine due to the way the new one is set back further to allow for the way the aircraft now park, then the old building will be demolished. I believe though that the old ATC tower is a protected structure.
Stepping Stone wrote: » I heard (although I don't know how true it is) that they decided to apply for permission to knock it
Red Nissan wrote: » Ye, the stories fly around alright. I was told that the old terminal was being renovated and that I'd not recognise it upon completion. What actually happened over the years was the seemingly less planned new terminal and car park and the old terminal actually just abandoned, except for the odd art installation.