Scortho wrote: » from looking at others its really commit really hard or not. It doesnt seem to be a half arsed approach. Also compare your end of year 1st year result with what you need to get schools...if theyre both over or very close to a 1st id go for it...
JeaicMaG wrote: » I ended up with a first overall last year but there's modules this year I have little to no interest in that have me on the fence (PH2003, PH2004 in a way :P). The advantages are too good to pass up though I think!
Blue giant wrote: » Hi to all. I have some questions regarding this course and was advised to try here. One of if not my favourite subject is chemistry. How much chemistry is involved in it? Is it all chemistry? I was also wondering about hours and male to female ratio. I have heard bad reports about employment opportunities for pharmacists is this true? I would quite like to work abroad for at least a few years after graduating. Is there jobs available in countries such as Oz NZ US or Canada. Thanks for taking the time to read this.
Scortho wrote: » Lots of chemistry. Lots and lots of chemistry. Even clinical lectures involve lots of chemistry. Think it's around 60-75 % female to 35-30% male. Jobs are fine, no shortage of people who need medication. Degree is recognised in eu. Further exams needed for us (very tough to find a pharmacist in the states to take you on as an intern if your not American trained. Not sure on canada. Austrailia I think requires more exams as well. Just to add with relation to jobs your employable across a wide range of areas including industry (qualified person, sales, marketing, research,) hospital pharmacist, academia, community pharmacist, regulatory and more.
Blue giant wrote: » Thanks for replying. I would prefer to go into community pharmacy because I'd like the daily interaction with people. I just have two more questions:-) how much money does a pharmacist get paid at first and then when you're experienced. Also is it common for pharmacists to start up their own pharmacy? Thanks again
Scortho wrote: » If you're going into this for the money, then no don't do the course. You won't last. I've heard various wages reported but around 35k starting off going up to 65k -80 k for a supervising pharmacist. Out of my year (4th year) I'm the only one who definitely wants to own their own pharmacy. Most in fact don't want to work as pharmacists. I'd know more pharmacists who don't want to own their own, than do. But it's easier for a pharmacist to open a pharmacy than someone who isn't to open a pharmacy.
Blue giant wrote: » I wouldn't go into any course just for the money but it is reassuring to know you would have a sufficient income in the future. Regarding people not wanting to open their own pharmacies is it just a case of not willing to take a risk or does it just not make sense? I've also heard that a lot of big chains will come in making it near impossible to open on your own. Is this true or is it just talk?
ahmdoda wrote: » for me it would be to much time consuming i mean opening and supervising your own pharmacy and then taking full care of it would rob alot of time that could deprive you of improving your skill as a pharmacist as you become more bussiness inclined and also reduces your chances of going into other branches of pharmacy like hospital and industry due to the commitment
Huell wrote: » Hey, I am doing my leaving cert this year and pharmacy in trinity is of high interest to me, but the thing is I don't do chemistry and regret so. What are the other ways you can get into pharmacy? If I done common entry science or something for a year with sufficent amount of points would i be able to transfer in after a year? Thanks
Deleted User wrote: » Why are 8 of my "direct contact" hours spent on this stupid BY1101 module...
ahmdoda wrote: » hahaha todays labs must have been the pointless 3 hours ever spend we spent like 10 mintues preparing these slides at leaving cert level doing the same technique at collage level takes 3 hours lol
[Deleted User] wrote: » Why are 8 of my "direct contact" hours spent on this stupid BY1101 module...
Scortho wrote: » Wait until your in 4th year and you'll wonder what has half this stuff got to do with pharmacy!
[Deleted User] wrote: » We spent 3 hours today in Biology labs to make 3 microscope slides. 3 hours. 3.
JeaicMaG wrote: » Parenchyma, Sclerenchyma, Collenchyma... Plants are just fascinating :P I can't wait for pharmacognosy tomorrow... On a side note I'm beginning to wonder if schols are even physically possible without sleeping very little :P
BlutendeRabe wrote: » It gets better next year (not). In fairness Fabio's stuff is awful. Doesn't get much worse than that.
JeaicMaG wrote: » Yep I wonder will Sasse's be any better :L I've heard people in the year saying they like it but I despise it.
Scortho wrote: » Ask partyatmygaff about pharmacognosy labs in second year and parenchyma. :pac:
JeaicMaG wrote: » On a side note I'm beginning to wonder if schols are even physically possible without sleeping very little :P
partyatmygaff wrote: » Chloral hydrate + hydrochloric(ky) acid. The recipe to a nice cleared slide so you can see all the incredibly fascinating parenchyma. Sleep is for the weak. Sasse's 03 material was actually quite nice I think... you won't know how you feel about it until next term because that's where she covers the bulk of her new 03 material.
ahmdoda wrote: » can any one here tell me about the pharmacy scholarship exam if anyone around had successfully done it? in term of its difficulty, the amount of work you should put into it and how does the paper differ from the usual summer exam one and finally is it worth all the effort? in term of helping you get a job in the end and making life in collage abit easier ? although im only 1st year am considering to do it next year is
BlutendeRabe wrote: » Yeah know this is late, but who do we have for that seminar in 4003?