Mardy Bum wrote: » I have a feeling we would be complaining just as vociferously. CAOs of multinationals get paid far more than any public service will pay. Its hard to really say for certain how the country is doing now compared with 2008 but we should know in five years time as hindsight is 20/20
Fighting Irish wrote: » Ye that's right, all big corporations pay nothing towards society. I'm willing to bet google pay more towards irish society than you ever will
Mardy Bum wrote: » Senior civil servants do the job you are ascribing to MOL already. You m ay want to change them first. The politicians didn't write the property tax letter. The hullabaloo about it was comical also especially the TDs who said they couldn't read it. They should be the first for the chopping block. We need a much greater social and cultural change if we want to change politics and the management of the country.
Permabear wrote: » This post had been deleted.
Sunglasses Ron wrote: » As always, despite its rep, the DM has more details than any other outlet.
April O Neill wrote: » That's why it's so popular, we know they'll dish the dirt.
Tom wrote: » First to go would be the west of ireland - sold off to the highest bidder for scrap.
April O Neill wrote: » I dunno, the western seaboard from Donegal all the way down to Kerry comprises the most beautiful part of the country, which is very valuable to us. :pac:
SpaceTime wrote: » You can't run a country like a company. Countries run for reasons other than shareholder profit and companies are essentially run as dictatorships by a board with employees who are motivated to be there by being paid. It just wouldn't work.
April O Neill wrote: » Considering USC revenue is pretty much neck-in-neck with corporate tax revenue, you'd be very wrong there. Add on the other employment and personal taxes and Irish citizens are contributing far more to society by a country mile. Now, I'm aware that corporations are providing employment, but up that ol' corporation tax rate and they'd be goneski!
Fighting Irish wrote: » lol
Kettleson wrote: » Google hasn't got a patch on Big Pharmas exploitation and global manipulation/financial stranglehold on the total world population and its health.
Teyla Emmagan wrote: » F7ck no. From what I know about the place it's a highly competitive working environment where people are nearly afraid to go home in case someone else gets ahead of them. And most of the people it employs are hipster w&nkers. All of those companies that go on with the 'our staff work in jeans and we have a playstation lounge!!!' are just sucking in the weak minded, that's corporate codswallop. They exist to make a PROFIT!!! And they employ the young, well educated and articulate - where would most of the population fit into this new Utopia? And I would HATE all that enthusiasm - all those articles you see with smiling young Googlians with their lovely Italian skin and bright Danish smiles, gushing about how wonderful the place is, like Benetton models on crack. Gives me willies. You can keep your poxy Google.
Jimoslimos wrote: » You mean like a company, that with the exception of a re-badged laptop and phone, doesn't actually produce anything tangible for export. A vastly over-valued company with a grossly inflated stock market share. Bubble anyone? Sounds like Ireland has already tried that approach.
Fussgangerzone wrote: » So, you're saying we should run the country like Big Pharma™ ?