197th.User Id wrote: » I truly suspect a cunning level of subtle trolling within this thread. WHAT?
WoollyRedHat wrote: » If she was, there would be a little matter of her admitting her invovlement when she was alive no? She had already been to jail after all. Boston college as part of their research and testimony would have taken steps before taping people to assess their credibility, and they obviously deemed Price and what she was saying was credible enough to include.
197th.User Id wrote: » I truly suspect a cunning level of subtle trolling within this thread. However, if not.Let us examine the evidence.A recording from an ex-member of a prescribed organization. A recording from a mentally unstable woman. Let us take the big bad Gerry out of this. I will go on taped record as saying my neighbor is guilty of a local crime. A separate person, ex-Ira, with serious mental issues will do the same. (for the sake of the exercise I too am an ex-member of the Ira). For some it would seem that is sufficient evidence.
WoollyRedHat wrote: » Here we go again. The evidence has been taken by college researchers who as part of history standards and procedures would of have to follow certain guidelines. They didn't just pick any random person up on the streets of N.I who didn't like Adams and his involvement in the peace process. The PSNI are interested enough to try and get the university to hand over these recordings.
Busted Flat. wrote: » Do you really know what you are talking about, have you a link as to who interviewed the people.
Wattle wrote: » I'd be interested to know what your interpretation of Adams's role was prior to the beginnings of the peace process?
197th.User Id wrote: » Well someone said it on a tape some time or other to someone else so it must be true.
197th.User Id wrote: » And when that possible evidence becomes available you might have something other than.A recording from an ex-member of a prescribed organization. A recording from a mentally unstable woman. For now it seems to me that you cannot separate your opinion of Gerry Adams from legal process.
Happyman42 wrote: » the police have them for quite a while now, and guess what...no arrests. It's 'hearsay' is the reason that it isn't enough to convict.
WoollyRedHat wrote: » Evidently more than you do, as you can't understand why this wouldn't be just hearsay evidence. Ed Moloney co-ordinated it and Anthony McIntyre and Wilson McArthur are two researchers involved.
Fr_Dougal wrote: » I hope Adams starts to sue for defamation.
D1stant wrote: » Bloody hell. You cant say boo about Gerry without a bitch-fest Lets put it another way. Lets suppose (just suppose, deep breaths) that Gerry did order McConville's murder What would your position be on him then? ( to Busted Flat et al)
Filibuster wrote: » I looked up Anthony McIntyre, the guy who interviewed the Delorous, and he's a dissident republican who hates SF. TBH I wouldn't trust this guy like I don't Gerry and Martin.
Busted Flat. wrote: » https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=7&cad=rja&ved=0CFMQFjAG&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.irishcentral.com%2Fnews%2FBoston-tapes-useless-in-tracing-Jean-McConvilles-IRA-murderers-217222881.html&ei=yux2UoapOs-Q7Aazz4HQCg&usg=AFQjCNE7YYKwNZHEwTpmSBWO5jf-5ezvZA&bvm=bv.55819444,d.ZGU Bray says that in the archives, interview materials were marked only by a coded letter and court documents have used that coding to discuss which of the tapes Boston College is to provide to the Government. But Boston College does not have a key to connect those coded identities to the real identities of the interviewees. Boston lawyer Jeffrey Swope, who represented the university in the proceedings, has acknowledged that the school’s archivists have never had that identification key. Read more: http://www.irishcentral.com/news/Boston-tapes-useless-in-tracing-Jean-McConvilles-IRA-murderers-217222881.html#ixzz2jdKcg7hv Follow us: @IrishCentral on Twitter | IrishCentral on Facebook
197th.User Id wrote: » When did this become about me ? Also, when did I say all those who suicide are liars ? For the record I don't have any strong opinion of Gerry one way or the other. I have some level of admiration for some aspects of his life, he rarely if ever comes up in my conversation.
Happyman42 wrote: » That he may have been involved in something distasteful? My answer to that is frankly...so what? A lot of people where involved in nearly 40 years of distastefulness, and some of them sat down and hammered out a deal and stuck to that deal. That is what is now important, that and actual evidence that they where involved in either an illegal organisation or distasteful acts. Evidence actually exists about the bombing of my local town and Dublin in which 33 people where disappeared (mainly innocent women) yet there are no 'Irish' people on here 'disgusted' or 'appalled' that the British Government won't release the papers relating to it. Yet they are happy to drag down somebody who is responsible for bringing peace and equality to this island and who is holding his organisation together. Probably the only man capable of that at the present time. Full of biased nonsense that is not in any way helpful to a delicate peace process, would be my opinion of them tbh. And before the attacks begin, I am not and never have been a SF supporter.
Wattle wrote: » Well you're defending Adams pretty robustly here and I'm just wondering what you think Gerry was doing while all these bombings and shootings were going on? What was his role prior to the peace process?