bizmark wrote: » /o\ good god I to want to be tracked by the all knowing benevolent government every day every time i travel and do anything
Bambi wrote: » its threads like this that make you realise how the brits managed to overlord this country for so long
Valetta wrote: » Ah... the old "ordinary folk" line. Next it will be "the most vunerable in society". Yawn. Give me a break.
Celly Smunt wrote: » But it might save a small amount of money.Sure how much is your personal freedom worth?
end of the road wrote: » no it isn't "proper order" as its a political stunt and thats all it will be, infact i'd wager it won't happen at all. a great statement, used by supporters of a survailence big brother society, doesn't work on me, just because i've nothing to hide doesn't mean i put up with any old thing
bumper234 wrote: » Do you believe that people who are on the dole should be able to work and not pay tax?
I don't believe i should be classed as suspect and interrogated leaving my house in the morning over what other people
Celly Smunt wrote: » I don't believe i should be classed as suspect and interrogated leaving my house in the morning over what other people do.
Yawns wrote: » Doubt it tbh. Anyone doing a nixer can simply say they are going to the shops or something. Unless you catch them with tools and in some kind of uniform, not many if any at all will get caught. However going into an industrial estate during typical industrial working hours would be enough suspicion to have you called into office for an interview. If you are signing on everyday for 2 weeks or so your employer won't be happy to have you off work. If the employer wasn't aware you were claiming whilst working, they won't be happy either. Either way it's easier to to catch them in industrial estates rather than housing estates. Not 100% effective either as what about retail workers or pubs etc. I suppose for retail you could have local social department workers sent out around the local area in hopes they might recognise a face from the dole queue. If they do, they could have them come in for an interview and sign on every day for a week or 2 etc. But then you'd most likely need to pay an expense to the DSP worker for taking them out of the office and what not.
Jamie2k9 wrote: » If the Government do this well and catch good numbers of people and make the savings it will go in their favour in the pools. People who do a hard days work want the social system reformed and fraud removed and only if this happens will this FG get my vote in 2016. Why not?
bumper234 wrote: » How will you be "interrogated" the guard will ask you your name , address and where you are going. The social welfare guy will run your name through the system and if you are not in there as a claimant then that will be the last you hear about it.
Celly Smunt wrote: » They won't catch anyone,how do you prove somebody is going to work for money.Nothing is stopping paddy the plasterer saying he's going to do up his mothers house. Plus,the person stopped by the guards is under no obligation to speak in front of the social welfare inspector behind him.The person can request a confidential conversation where no information can be shared and where by the inspector can't listen in. Won't work,won't happen.Thank fuck.
Valetta wrote: » Way to answer a question that wasn't asked.
Jamie2k9 wrote: » Come on do spill how much you are cheating the system?
bumper234 wrote: » If they suspect you are working and claiming they can investigate you and stop payments until you satisfy them that you are not working.
él statutorio wrote: » It's none of their bloody business where i'm going! If they suspect me of something then they can arrest me, otherwise they can fup off.
Celly Smunt wrote: » Why should i give my information and where i'm going to,to somebody out of the civil service who has no authority to ask?
bumper234 wrote: » No they can question you and if you refuse to answer then they can hold you. Do you work?
bumper234 wrote: » The guard will ask not the welfare officer.