penny1500 wrote: » I am doing the preparatory course in Contract and Tort in City Colleges...anyone else doing a preparatory course and we could swap notes?
Jesika wrote: » Hey! im hoping to do tort contract criminal and constitutional in march 2014, so id be interested in splitting prep notes for those courses??
michelle2000 wrote: » Hi all what are people covering for equity on weds?! Neaaaarly there
dandadub wrote: » Yeah some must do chapters would be cool. I only focused on three topics this time round due to time issues (full time employment and starting late) so Wednesdays equity paper is going to be an attempt at best
Ownleme wrote: » Started studying for it this afternoon. Relying on my law degree!
dandadub wrote: » What do you reckon is due a run?
Fe1stresser wrote: » Guys, Dont get discouraged. It's almost over. People pass these exams every sitting with at least a few bad questions. I passed criminal easily. He's a good marker. And constitutional is definitely not as bad as you think. I passed first time round with a healthy 2.1. Carolan's exam reports say he just wants you to understand the material not regurgitate every case you can think of. Study over the next few days, go through the exam papers and see how they are phrased. That's the most important thing. His problem questions can be difficult to decipher in the heat of the exam. You can pass by applying what you know, not by writing every single piece of case law on the topic but not applying it. Keep calm!! I promise I have passed some of these exams on questions that I didn't understand (ie Tort) (maybe not ideal but there you go). Of all the markers, I think Courtney is the toughest. Even then, his exam reports are very detailed and he just expects you to know the stuff. Deep breaths! xx
dinemo6 wrote: » Quick Question- i signed up for EU tomorrow but not going to sit it now- just wondering would I still have to go and sign in or is it ok to just not turn up?? This isn't my first sitting so the requirement to sit 4 on your first go doesn't apply to me..
Milkypops wrote: » im thinking joint account and quistclose trusts(note) rectification and specific performance aswell (maybe together) Im iffy that undue influence will come up, I think its due a break and it also came up in the Contract paper this sitting. Mareva Injunctions with the case of Collins v Gharion being very recent aswell. God Equity sucks
Ownleme wrote: » Totally not questioning you on your opinion that undue influence won't come up but do you think the examiners compare papers like that?
Milkypops wrote: » well not completely sure....im more going on the fact that the exam papers this sitting seem to be awkward and not as predictable as other sittings. Im not saying its not gonna come up, I have studied it (remembering it is another thing) but I wouldn't be relying on it as a banker that's all....cannot wait for Wednesday to come and go!
Ownleme wrote: » Rembering definitely doesn't follow as nicely as I thought it would from studying. If the papers r awkward mayb that's why they'll put it on again just to defy logic. Makes no difference to me whether it appears or not tho. I know as little about it as I do everything else!
Milkypops wrote: » haha ya same as....I really should have done charitable and trusteeship now in hindsight but just couldn't be bothered now ugh! I think im just gonna leave it for tonight and wake up with a fresh head tomorrow which will fill with information ahahah!
