KKkitty wrote: » She was a care assistant so must have had some level of mental intelligence. The only thing that was on her mind was claiming benefits for her deceased child fraudulently.
KKkitty wrote: » I don't feel any sympathy for her at al.
Femme_Fatale wrote: » But I don't think anyone is saying it is. It might just mean in some cases ultimately being locked up for life in a psychiatric institution which is hardly getting off lightly.
anncoates wrote: » Are you implying that I do?
Compu Global Hyper Meganet wrote: » From what I've gleaned from repeated viewings of "One flew over the cuckoo's nest", it could be worse! My point is that attempting to differentiate between degrees of mental instability/outright insanity is dangerous, therefore all extreme (for want of a better word) criminals should be treated similarly.
Femme_Fatale wrote: » The house was covered in ****, rotting matter and rubbish - it's highly likely she's severely messed up in the head, but apparently merely acknowledging this is somehow "excusing" her? I still think she should be imprisoned for life so how am I excusing her? Thought they were?
KKkitty wrote: » Breaks my heart to think people like this exist.
Candie wrote: » We don't know that, unless we're mind readers. You can be mentally ill and of high or low intelligence. If she's ill she'll get treatment and punishment. If she's not ill she'll get punishment. Either way, she's not going to go unpunished. We don't know if she's mad or bad or both, but she won't walk away from this and nobody is 'excusing' her.
smileyj1987 wrote: » This makes you wish corporal punishment was still around .
T-Maxx wrote: » She's a junkie and an alcoholic.